The American judiciary, once a bastion of restraint and fidelity to the Constitution, has descended into a cesspool of activism that threatens the very fabric of our Republic.
On May 15, 2025, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in a case that will inevitably address this crisis: a challenge to the rampant use of nationwide injunctions by lower court judges to obstruct President Donald Trump’s agenda. These injunctions, issued with reckless abandon, are not mere legal tools but weapons of ideological warfare, wielded by unelected judges to impose their will on the entire nation.
Yet, as egregious as this judicial overreach is, it is surpassed only by the inexcusable inaction of the Republican-controlled Congress, which has squandered its mandate to codify Trump’s executive orders into law and curb the courts’ excesses. This dual betrayal—by activist judges and feckless legislators—demands a reckoning.
The case before the Supreme Court stems from the Trump administration’s appeal against a federal judge’s use of a nationwide injunction to block a key immigration and citizenship policy, but it hinges on the ability of the federal district courts to affect national policy. Over 100 lawsuits have been filed against Trump’s initiatives, targeting everything from immigration enforcement to federal spending freezes to the elimination of divisive diversity, equity, and inclusion programs. In response, district court judges have issued a barrage of injunctions that halt these policies not just for the plaintiffs but for every person and entity in the United States.
This practice is not only unprecedented in its scope but fundamentally unconstitutional—and, in fact, anti-constitutional, as it allows a single judge to dictate national policy without the accountability of an electoral mandate or a legislative process.
The Trump administration rightly argues that these judges are exceeding their Article III authority, which limits judicial power to resolving “cases” and “controversies” between specific parties. As Acting Solicitor General Sarah Harris told the Supreme Court in March 2025, the judiciary must say “enough is enough” to this abuse. Nationwide injunctions, she argued, create “irreparable harm” to our democratic system by preventing the Executive Branch from implementing policies that reflect the will of the electorate.
Justices Neil Gorsuch, Elena Kagan, and Clarence Thomas have previously signaled skepticism about this practice, with Gorsuch decrying in 2020 the “increasingly common” tendency of trial courts to issue relief that “transcends the cases before them.” The Constitution is clear: judges are not policymakers, and their role is to adjudicate disputes, not to legislate from the bench.
Yet, the audacity of these judges knows no bounds. As President Trump himself stated in a March 2025 Truth Social post:
“These Judges want to assume the Powers of the Presidency, without having to attain 80 Million Votes. They want all of the advantages with none of the risks.”
His words cut to the heart of the issue: unelected judges, insulated from public accountability, are usurping the authority of a president chosen by tens of millions of Americans. This isn’t justice. Nor is it the rule of law; it’s tyranny cloaked in robes.
The defenders of this judicial overreach, including a cadre of House Democrats who filed an amicus brief, claim that blocking Trump’s policies prevents “chaos.” Their argument is as disingenuous as it is hypocritical. The real chaos is the erosion of democratic governance, where the will of the people, expressed through their elected president, is subverted by a handful of activist judges. The Competitive Enterprise Institute’s Devin Watkins aptly framed the central question: Do lower courts have the power to issue injunctions that affect non-parties? The answer, rooted in constitutional text and tradition, is a resounding no.
If the judiciary’s activism is a dagger aimed at the heart of Trump’s agenda, the Republican-controlled Congress is the hand that refuses to pull it out. With control of both the House and Senate, Republicans have a historic opportunity to enact legislation that limits the scope of federal district courts and codifies Trump’s executive orders into law. Yet, they have done nothing—nothing—to seize this moment. Their inaction is not merely a failure of leadership; it is a betrayal of the voters who entrusted them with power.
Article III of the Constitution explicitly grants Congress the authority to regulate the jurisdiction of federal courts. Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA), acknowledged this in March 2025, stating:
“The Constitution limits judges to exercising power over ‘cases’ or ‘controversies.’ Judges are not policymakers, and allowing them to assume this role is very dangerous.”
Republicans have even introduced legislation to curb the courts’ ability to issue nationwide injunctions, recognizing that such measures violate the constitutional Separation of Powers. But where is the urgency? Where is the resolve to push these bills through with the same fervor that Trump brings to his reformative agenda?
More infuriating still is Congress’s failure to codify Trump’s executive orders into law through stand-alone legislation, ensuring that every member of the House and Senate is on record with their votes for the electorate to see. The president has issued a slew of orders aimed at restoring constitutionality, streamlining government, and eliminating waste, fraud, and spendthrift policies. These orders are not mere suggestions; they are a clarion call for a return to fiscal sanity and national sovereignty. Yet, the Republican Congress, with its majority in both chambers, has not moved to enshrine these policies in statute through individual bills that demand transparency and accountability from every legislator. Why? Are they afraid of the political fallout? Do they lack the spine to take a stand? Or are they simply content to coast on Trump’s coattails without doing the hard work of governing?
Codifying Trump’s orders through stand-alone legislation would serve multiple purposes:
First, it would force every member of Congress to publicly declare their stance, allowing voters to hold them accountable.
Second, it would provide a legislative bulwark against judicial overreach, as statutory law is far harder for courts to overturn than executive actions.
Third, it would ensure the longevity of Trump’s reforms, protecting them from reversal by future administrations.
The fact that Republicans have not prioritized this task is a scandal of epic proportions.
The clock is ticking. Republicans have until the 2026 Mid-Term Elections to deliver on the mandate they were given. Every day they waste is a day that activist judges and their allies in the Deep State gain ground. The American people didn’t elect Trump and a Republican Congress to watch them dither and delay. They elected them to act—to cut through the bureaucratic morass, to restore constitutional governance, and to put America first.
Congress must immediately pass legislation to limit the scope of federal district courts, explicitly prohibiting nationwide injunctions that affect non-parties. They must also move with all deliberate speed to codify Trump’s executive orders through stand-alone legislation, from immigration enforcement to spending reforms to the dismantling of woke bureaucratic programs, ensuring that every legislator’s vote is recorded for posterity. These are not optional tasks; they are imperatives for the survival of our Republic.
The American people are watching, and we are growing impatient. If Republicans continue to move at a snail’s pace, they risk squandering the greatest opportunity in a generation to reshape the federal government in the image of its founding principles.
The time for excuses is over. It’s time for We the People to demand action, to whip our elected representatives into line, and to hold them accountable for their inaction.
The judiciary may think it can rule by fiat, but Congress has the power—and the duty—to prove them wrong. The question is whether they have the courage to do so and whether our continued support for them is worth it.
Then, when we return, our segment on America’s Third Watch, broadcast nationally from our flagship station WGUL AM860 & FM93.7 in Tampa, Florida.
In Closing…
Politics and current events in the headlines; they aren’t just noise—their consequences carve the path for our lives, our communities, and the future of our nation. They demand our attention, not as passive observers, but as guardians of the principles that define us. To stay informed is a patriotic duty, a quiet yet powerful act of stewardship. It’s not just about knowing the latest hot topics—it’s about piercing through the fog of spin and clickbait to uncover the truth. This vigilance holds those in power accountable, ensuring the Republic we cherish remains true to its founding ideals.
And engagement doesn’t end with understanding. It flows into the conversations we share—with family, friends, or the neighbor we come to have a moment with. These exchanges, rooted in listening and connection, reveal the common ground we’re often told doesn’t exist. The forces that thrive on division falter when we unite; when we rediscover the shared values that bind us as Americans. In this unity lies our strength, a united resolve that transcends mere voting and becomes a living testament to our nation’s spirit.
So, seek the truth, foster connections, and let your commitment to the shared Great American Experiment reflect the heart of what it means to be American. Together, we’re not just citizens—we’re neighbors, allies, united in a legacy of liberty and justice, ever striving for that more perfect union.
Share this post