The Far-Left ‘Hitler’ Narrative Is A Gateway To Something More Sinister

Nov 01, 2024

Listen to a bonus Underground USA Election 2024 segment on America’s Third Watch:

0:00

-16:32

You can’t go anywhere without hearing the caustic narrative of the neo-Marxist Far-Left: Trump is Hitler. But if you believe that narrative was created to affect the 2024 General Election you would be far off the target. It’s meant to facilitate something much more sinister.

For four years, we have been told that should Trump win the 2024 General Election, he would be a “dictator on day one,” and that he would institute fascism. And lately, the far-Left has advanced the blatant lie that Trump would “turn the US military loose on American citizens” if he once again became president.

The rhetoric has gotten so over-the-top ridiculous that even one neo-Bolshevik host of the jadedly Leftist The Young Turks podcast, Ana Kasparian, has cracked her propagandistic veneer to utter the truth.

In a recent post on X, Kasparian wrote:

“Ok. Fine. I'll bite. Fascism requires a militarized citizenry, conquest/imperialism, the elimination of our governing bodies (like Congress), and the notion that anyone who isn't part of a master race should be *massacred*. Weird thing to label a guy who brags about not starting any new wars. He also passed criminal justice reform and personally pardoned black inmates who were serving life sentences for drug crimes who Obama was unwilling to pardon. But I'm the ‘fucking stupid’ one. Okay.”

Kasparian is spot-on correct. Everything about Donald Trump–from his four years in office to his current four-year run for re-election to the presidency–has been the antithesis of fascism; the inverse of what a dictator would utilize to affect political control.

There was no US military intervention initiated by his hand anywhere to retain power or to quell dissent, even when cities like Minneapolis, Portland, Seattle, Los Angeles, Chicago, New York, Washington, DC, and elsewhere burned at the hands of rioters during each summer of Donald Trump’s presidency:

2016: While not technically during Trump's presidency, protests against Trump's candidacy, especially after his election, included some violent outbreaks. In Portland, Oregon, protests turned violent shortly after the election, with a crowd of about 4,000 leading to police declaring a riot.
2017: Protests against Trump's policies, including immigration policies like the border wall, led to significant mobilizations. While many were peaceful, there were notable instances where protests became violent, leading to significant police action.
2018: This year saw various protests–some of which turned violent from the tension, including those related to immigration and Trump's administration policies.
2019: There were protests more focused on specific issues like gun control and the aftermath of the Mueller report, with less widespread violence compared to other years, but violent clashes between law enforcement and protesters nevertheless.
2020: This year stands out due to the George Floyd protests, which included instances of violence, especially in the summer. The protests against a contrived charge of “racial injustice” and police brutality saw a significant response from National Guard deployment, notably in cities like Portland, leading to confrontations. The media often referred to them as “mostly peaceful protests,” though they were actually violent protests and riots, existing as part of a broader movement.

And during the far-Left’s holy grail event of “Trump fascism”–January 6th, there was no attempt, even by the unlawful rioters–not the peaceful protesters but the unlawful rioters–to “eliminate” Congress or overthrow the government. The crowd outside the US Capitol was exercising a “redress of government” in its protest of an Electoral College vote they believed to be unlawful and unconstitutional. Those who broke the law (and many who didn’t) were hunted down and arrested by the Biden-Harris Department of Justice, with many incarcerated in solitary confinement while they awaited trials that took the majority of the Biden-Harris administration to prosecute if they were prosecuted at all.

Leading to that event, as I wrote in an article titled, The Far-Left’s Impending Election Denial:

“True, Trump held a massive rally on January 6th, 2021, and many of those participants marched down to Capitol Hill to exercise their First Amendment right to redress government. But there was no incitement to insurrection or to violence. In fact, the words Trump used in addressing the crowd’s intent to march to the Capitol were:
“‘I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard…’
“Those are not the words used by an insurrectionist. They just aren’t.”

And Donald Trump is not the candidate that casually tossed around the labels of “Hitler,” “Nazis,” and “garbage” when talking about his opponent or his opponent’s supporters. Those slurs were issued by the sitting president, the Democrat’s unelected nominee), the far-Left of the Democrat Party, and the Democrat rank-and-file to include the mainstream media.

This group’s unwavering dedication to the institution of “wokeism” through the applications of Critical Race Theory (CRT), Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI), and the manufactured transgender movement has, indeed, ideologically established an ipso facto “master ideology,” and that–in and of itself–is more akin to Nazism than anything that Donald Trump or the MAGA movement has engaged in.

In fact, when the evidence is weighed, Democrats haven’t facilitated a calm and rational transfer of power after an election loss since Michael Dukakis lost. They went straight into election denial mode during the Bush-Gore recount in 2000, John Kerry’s loss to Bush in 2004, and Hillary Clinton’s loss to Donald Trump in 2016 when she called his presidency illegitimate from the get-go.

So, with the polls (and as I said, I put little faith in polling because of the abuse of push polling) indicating a Trump victory on November 5th, the uptick of caustic messaging about Trump can hardly be seen as a last-ditch effort to achieve victory for Kamala Harris. That rhetoric, coupled with the campaign trail blunders executed by Harris surrogates like Bill Clinton, Joe Biden, and Barack Obama, indicate one of two things: 1) the most ineptly run presidential campaign in the history of the United States, or 2) the setting of the stage for post-election violence.

This post is public, so feel free to share it.

The Basis For Far-Left & Deep State
Organized Post-Election Violence

When juxtaposing the scorecard on political violence, the evidence is overwhelming that activists, anarchists, special interests, and Deep State operatives from the far-Left are much more likely to facilitate, encourage, and engage in violence than any group from the Right. Blue cities can’t even celebrate a World Series victory without expressing their emotions through acts of violence.

But far from being a theory (or conspiracy theory, as it were), this indication of violence, should Donald Trump win on November 5th, has already been wargamed by a super-secret “bipartisan” panel operating under The Chatham House Rule.

As The Guardian reported in October of this year:

“Dozens of men and women in a Washington DC-area hotel conference center were seated at tables arranged to resemble the White House situation room, wearing name tags denoting their part in the role-play. Prominent people from both parties were in character as the president of the United States, AKA Trump; the joint chiefs of staff; Republican and Democratic governors; Congress members; federal prosecutors; religious and business leaders; and community organizers.
“About 175 people participated in five exercises, bringing to the process an extraordinary wealth of bipartisan institutional knowledge. Among the lineup were senior officials from successive administrations of both parties, including the Trump administration.
“They came with a mission: to wargame Trump acting out the most extreme authoritarian elements of his agenda and explore what could be done, should he win in November, to protect democracy in the face of possible abuses of power. What they discovered could be used to inform public debate and sound the alarm about what most participants agreed was a woeful lack of preparation.”

This wargaming was the brainchild of the far-Left Brennan Center’s The Democracy Futures Project, which, in its propaganda, states:

“The role-playing exercises were designed to test how well checks and balances, broadly understood, might restrain a president from abusing his power. The results were not encouraging: The games demonstrated repeatedly that an authoritarian in control of the executive branch, with little concern for legal limits, holds a structural advantage over any lawful effort to restrain him…But they point to preparations that could be undertaken now to improve the odds for democracy and the rule of law — and some existing guardrails that might not be widely understood…”

This effort includes a cadre of never-Trumpers, Deep State actors, and neo-fascist private sector potentates who, with a Harris loss, would be vulnerable to losing their globalist grip on the United States. Among those who took part were Republicans, Democrats, and independents; liberals, conservatives, and centrists (including veterans of the first Trump administration and previous administrations of both parties); former governors, former cabinet members, former state attorneys general, former members of the House and Senate, retired flag and general officers, labor leaders, faith leaders, grassroots activists, members of the Brennan Center staff, and C-suite business executives.

Also comingled in this Who’s Who of genuine threats to our Republic and the free will of Americanism were the “fine folks” of a shadowy group calling itself Protect Democracy, a 501c3 non-profit organization whose mission statement is to, put succinctly:

“...use litigation, legislative and communications strategies, technology, research, and analysis to stand up for free and fair elections, the rule of law, fact-based debate, and a better democracy for future generations.”

According to Time Magazine, the group is a "defender of America's system of government against the threat of authoritarianism."

Just who are the leaders of Project Democracy? They include Ian Bassin, Justin Florence, and Emily Loeb, who served as lawyers in the White House Counsel’s Office under former President Barack Obama.

The Far-Left’s Penchant For Transformative Revolution

When the far-Left–the neo-Marxist revolutionary Left–fails to achieve its goals through the domination of a country’s legitimate governmental system, it invariably turns to revolution.

It is important to remember Barack Obama’s words here: “We are just five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.” That has been the goal all along. It has been the covert–and now the overt–goal of the radical Left ever since the Wilson administration and the introduction of progressivism, and especially since the neo-Marxist genie of the Obama era was let out of the Chicago politics bottle in 2008.

I would ask you now to think back to the Obama years and his administration’s almost ghoulish-like glee for the transformative revolutions that happened around the world. They did little to nothing to stop them or to aid the US-aligned governments that came under siege (they did, however, stand by and do nothing to help the people of Iran and Cuba). These revolutions occurred in:

Iran (which brought Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to power)
Tunisia (leading to the ousting of pro-Western President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali)
Egypt (leading to the resignation of pro-US President Hosni Mubarak)
Libya
Yemen (leading to the resignation of pro-Western President Ali Abdullah Saleh)
Syria
Bahrain
Brazil
Turkey
Ukraine (resulting in the annexation of Crimea by Russia and conflict in Eastern Ukraine)
Hong Kong
Venezuela
Bosnia & Herzegovina
Burundi

The Obama administration’s penchant for transformative revolution bled over into Obama 2.0, otherwise known as the Biden-Harris administration. Starting in July 2021, widespread anti-government protests occurred across Cuba, which were among the largest demonstrations since the revolution in 1959. These protests were primarily driven by economic conditions, shortages of food, medicine, and electricity, and political frustrations. In typical neo-Marxist fashion, the Obamaites of the Biden-Harris administration did absolutely nothing to come to the aid of the Cuban people.

In all of these instances, either pro-Western leaders and governments were dispatched, or neo-Marxist leaders and governments were elevated to power. There is a pattern, and it is undeniable.

Could The United States Be The
Target Of A Planned ‘Color Revolution’?

As noted by Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt (do those names sound familiar from the Obama-oriented Protect Democracy nonprofit organization?), the anti-Trump forces have failed in four of five avenues that would keep him from office; that would keep us from combatting the Deep States, the Uniparty, and the neo-fascists of the globalist inside-the-beltway class. So, they are promoting the final fifth avenue to usurp the American people: mass mobilization ala the color revolutions.

In a New York Times Op-Ed (remember I said they were being overt?), they wrote:

“That leaves a fifth strategy: societal mobilization. Democracy’s last bastion of defense is civil society. When the constitutional order is under threat, influential groups and societal leaders–chief executives, religious leaders, labor leaders and prominent retired public officials–must speak out, reminding citizens of the red lines that democratic societies must never cross. And when politicians cross those red lines, society’s most prominent voices must publicly and forcefully repudiate them…
“A recent example of societal mobilization is the German public reaction to the revelation of a secret November 2023 gathering in which leaders of the far-right AfD met with neo-Nazi groups and discussed a plan for the mass deportation of immigrants, including foreign-born German citizens.
“When the meeting came to light, the chairmen of the boards of Mercedes-Benz and Porsche joined top labor union leaders to condemn extremism…a network of small businesses started the Business for Democracy initiative and published a statement…defending democracy and [repudiating AfD policies and declared it was time to ‘stand up and intervene'...Those public declarations took place against the backdrop of the largest street demonstrations in the history of the Federal Republic of Germany…
“In the United States, the civic response to the Trump threat has been tepid…The US establishment is sleepwalking toward a crisis. An openly antidemocratic figure stands at least a 50-50 chance of winning the presidency. The Supreme Court and the Republican Party have abdicated their gatekeeping responsibilities, and too many of America’s most influential political, business and religious leaders remain on the sidelines. Unable to rise above fear or narrow ambition, they hedge their bets. But time is running out. What are they waiting for?”

Given the far-Left and activist-Left’s penchant for violent protest (and there can be no arguing away that their tendency toward violence-as-conflict-resolution exists) and their unwillingness to operate within the confines of the ratified US Constitution and the US political system of democratic elections to elect representatives to a Constitutional Republic, two questions seem to become paramount as the clock ticks down to the end of Election Day.

One, how bad will the far-Left violence be in the aftermath of a Trump victory, and will the majority of Americans be disgusted enough to demand law and order in our streets?

And two, will the American people, loyal to the Constitution and pure of heart, stand up against the neo-Marxist movement that seeks transformative change? Can they prevent a second, much bloodier US Civil War and the end of our Republic?

At this point, only time will tell…but the threat is real. It is very real.