It never, ever fails, ever. Democrat Deep Staters always, always, always telegraph their deeds, transposing them onto their opposition. It’s been happening since the days of Woodrow Wilson and it continues to this day.
Today’s uniparty Deep State tool is a frequent flier: Dick Durbin, a Democrat senator from Illinois. This Chicago-machine-anointed partisan hack has demonstrated his partisanship almost every second of his career, and his latest remarks don’t deviate from his far-Left fealty.
In response to President-elect Trump’s nomination of Kash Patel to head the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Durbin issued an infantile protest full of name-calling and “it’s not fair” whining, fully unbecoming of someone seated in the most prestigious legislative body on the planet.
“President Biden kept Director Wray in office because the FBI is supposed to be insulated from partisanship. Now, the president-elect wants to replace his own appointee with an unqualified loyalist…The Senate should reject this unprecedented effort to weaponize the FBI for the campaign of retribution that Donald Trump has promised.”
What? There is so much wrong with that statement it’s hard to know where to begin. But let’s take it from the top, shall we?
Durbin’s insistence that Patel shouldn’t be seated because President Biden kept Wray in place is an imbecilic notion. Under Wray, the FBI has been used in numerous ways to affect the political persecution of Americans.
The FBI was found to have labeled parents speaking out at school board meetings as potential “domestic terrorists.” This stemmed from a memo issued by the National School Boards Association (NSBA) in 2021, which served as an attempt to categorize outspoken parents as threats. The FBI response involved investigating these parents over their legitimate concerns about how the school districts were treating and educating their children.
In 2023, a subpoenaed document from the FBI's Richmond Field Office revealed coordination with multiple field offices to produce a memo targeting traditional Catholics as domestic terrorists. This memo was later withdrawn, but the incident exposed the FBI’s religious profiling and political bias.
The FBI under Wray has targeted agents based on their political beliefs, particularly those with conservative views or military backgrounds. This includes claims of harassment and retaliation against whistleblowers who spoke out against political biases within the agency.
The FBI has also been called on the carpet for not only not aggressively pursuing investigations into Hunter Biden, suggesting a protective stance towards political figures aligned with the Democrat party, but also covering up the facts surrounding what was on his laptop, couching it all as an exercise in Russian skullduggery.
Then we have the SWAT raid at former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago residence in 2022 where we now know the FBI was being used as a political tool against Trump and his 2024 election campaign.
And lastly, for our purposes here, we now know the FBI worked with social media companies to suppress information, particularly around the federal government’s COVID disinformation campaign and the Hunter Biden laptop story before the 2020 election.
By Durbin’s “ethical” standards, Trump should leave Wray in his position, well, just because Biden did, ignoring the fact—the indisputable fact—that under Christopher Wray, the FBI has been corrupted and politicized almost beyond repair.
Not only has Wray failed in his sworn oath to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic,” and “bear true faith and allegiance to the same,” he allowed partisan ideologues to rise to positions of power that allowed them to thwart investigations, hobble the search for truth and justice, and use the power of the FBI and its sacred public trust to benefit political ideologues.
Wray is a failed FBI director and rightfully deserves to be fired for dereliction of duty if not scrutinized for true acts of insurrection and sedition.
But, back to Durbin and his idiotic statement.
Durbin infers that Trump appointing an “unqualified loyalist” is ludicrous in both uses of the words.
First, why would any president, Trump, Biden, Obama—any of them, appoint someone who wasn’t loyal to their agenda? The idea is psychopathic on its face. In fact, it’s absurdity is self-evident to those with an IQ over that of a grape.
But “unqualified”? Durbin dares to use the term “unqualified” in the same sentence as the name Kash Patel?
Okay, quickly, because it would take hours to fully explain why Patel is more than qualified to be a reformative FBI director in the Trump administration:
Patel holds a Juris Doctor from Pace University School of Law and has a certificate in international law from the University of College London.
He worked as a federal prosecutor within the Justice Department, focusing on national security cases, which gives him direct experience in law enforcement related to federal crimes.
Patel served as a senior director for counterterrorism at the National Security Council during Trump's first term.
He was the Principal Deputy to the Acting Director of National Intelligence, Richard Grenell, in 2020.
He served as Chief of Staff to Acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller, where he was involved in significant policy decisions and had oversight relevant to managing the FBI's operations.
Patel worked as senior counsel to the House Intelligence Committee under Rep. Devin Nunes, where he was involved in investigations related to national security, including the Russia investigation into Trump's campaign; he exposed the Russia hoax. This role gave him insight into the intersection of politics, law, and intelligence.
In addition to those “qualifications,” Mr. Durbin, Patel has been a vocal supporter of Trump, often echoing Trump's views on the Deep State and the need for reform within federal agencies like the FBI.
So, far from being an “unqualified loyalist,” Patel’s loyalty and alignment with Trump's political objectives—along with each milestone of his career—are significant qualifications for the role, given Mr. Trump's stated goal to reshape the FBI into the organization that it once was: A federal law enforcement agency that serves the people rather than the politicians.
But, then, that’s why Dickie Durbin, the twit political hack from the glow-in-the-dark cobalt blue state of Illinois, stands against Patel’s nomination. In cleaning out the sewer that is the Deep State, Durbin’s malfeasance might come into the light, and, well, a corrupt Illinois politician can’t be having any of that…now can he?
As the flushing of the DC Swamp begins under Trump 2.0, get ready for an immense amount of pushback from Deep State uniparty assholes like Dick Durbin. They will not go quietly into the night. And that is why it is so incredibly important to keep the pressure on!!
And as a pre-post-script to it all, if the far-Left Democrats and Deep State uniparty douchebags were okay with stuffing appointments like Rachel Levine and Sam Brinton down our throats during the Biden-Harris administration, they shouldn’t have a damn thing to say about any of Donald Trump’s appointments.
Then, when we come back, our segment on America’s Third Watch, broadcast nationally from our flagship station WGUL AM930 & FM93.7 in Tampa, Florida.
Share this post