Billionaire-Funded ‘No Kings’ Network Gears Up for Nationwide Anti-Trump Disruptions
In a clear display of elite-driven opposition, the so-called grassroots “No Kings” movement—branded as a stand against authoritarianism but largely orchestrated by left-leaning nonprofits unleashed coordinated protests across more than 2,500 sites in all 50 states this weekend, targeting President Trump’s immigration enforcement, federal efficiency reforms, and recent government shutdown maneuvers as supposed overreaches of power. Backed by over $294 million in dark-money infusions from billionaire networks including George Soros’s Open Society Foundations, the Arabella Advisors hub, and contributions tied to figures like Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg, this effort draws on established activist groups such as Indivisible and MoveOn to mobilize crowds reciting familiar resistance scripts, even as Hollywood endorsers like Robert De Niro and Jimmy Kimmel lend their voices to what critics view as an attempt to undermine a duly elected administration rather than uphold democratic principles. While organizers frame the events as peaceful affirmations of American independence, the heavy financial footprint from unelected donors raises questions about the true independence of these gatherings, echoing patterns of funded agitation seen in prior anti-Trump mobilizations this year and underscoring tensions between voter mandates and institutional pushback.
Sources: ZeroHedge, The Washington Examiner
Anti-Israel Agitators Infiltrate Nationwide ‘No Kings’ Rallies, Fueling Concerns Over Tax-Exempt Radicalism
As nationwide “No Kings” protests unfold on October 18th, against perceived overreaches by the Trump administration—including immigration enforcement and federal workforce reductions—anti-Israel activists tied to the “global intifada” movement are weaving their agendas into the events, forming dedicated “Palestine Contingents” in cities from New York to Portland despite a recent Israel-Hamas ceasefire. Groups such as Jewish Voice for Peace, the Party for Socialism and Liberation, and Democratic Socialists of America are mobilizing participants to chant slogans linking “Free Palestine” with domestic grievances against ICE and police, raising alarms among Republican leaders about a web of Soros-funded nonprofits potentially skirting tax laws through partisan activism. With over 2,600 rallies drawing crowds under banners of resisting authoritarianism, the infusion of these contingents underscores a troubling convergence of foreign policy extremism and American dissent, prompting Justice Department probes into possible RICO violations and Senator Chuck Grassley’s scrutiny of funding flows to such organizations. This development highlights the risks of allowing tax-exempt entities to amplify divisive ideologies under the guise of civic engagement, potentially eroding public trust in both the protests and the institutions they claim to defend.
Sources: FOX News, The Times of Israel
Illegal Alien in Texas Faces Federal Charges for TikTok Bounty on ICE Officers’ Lives
Federal authorities in Dallas, Texas, swiftly apprehended 23-year-old Eduardo Aguilar, a Mexican national who entered the United States illegally in 2018 as an unaccompanied minor and ignored a 2019 deportation order, after he posted a TikTok video in Spanish on October 9th offering $10,000 bounties for the murder of Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. Aguilar, who also faced prior charges for liquor law violations, was found with a loaded 9mm handgun in his vehicle at the time of his October 14th arrest—a clear violation of federal prohibitions on firearm possession by those without legal status—prompting charges for transmitting interstate threats and underscoring the escalating dangers faced by ICE personnel enforcing congressional immigration laws amid reports of cartel-directed ambushes and assaults that have surged over 1,000 percent since early 2025. Department of Homeland Security officials emphasized that such threats, including broader cartel incentives ranging from $2,000 for doxxing agents to $50,000 for assassinations, will not deter efforts to hold accountable those who endanger law enforcement and American communities, ensuring Aguilar’s prompt prosecution and removal. This incident highlights the persistent challenges of securing borders and protecting officers dedicated to upholding national sovereignty.
Sources: US Dept of Homeland Security, FOX News
Trump Appeals to US Supreme Court to Restore Order with National Guard in Chicago
President Trump, exercising his constitutional authority to safeguard federal operations, has turned to the U.S. Supreme Court to lift a lower court’s restriction on deploying National Guard troops to the Chicago area, where federal immigration agents face escalating threats from violent protests and assaults that undermine law enforcement efforts. On October 17th, the Justice Department filed an emergency application arguing that U.S. District Judge April Perry’s order—upheld by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals—oversteps judicial bounds by second-guessing the executive’s assessment of risks, including ambushes on agents and attacks on federal property during Operation Midway Blitz, Trump’s targeted crackdown on illegal immigration in sanctuary cities. This move follows the federalization of 300 Illinois National Guard members and 400 from Texas for protective roles, a step rooted in longstanding federal statutes like 10 U.S.C. § 12406, which empower the president to counter dangers to national law execution without local consent when states falter. While Illinois Governor JB Pritzker decries the action as an “invasion” of state sovereignty and Chicago officials resist collaboration, the administration maintains that such deployments, echoing historical precedents from George Washington’s Whiskey Rebellion response, are essential to prevent further chaos and protect personnel, with the high court directing a state response by October 20th. This case underscores a broader pattern of Democratic-led jurisdictions obstructing federal priorities on border security and public safety, testing the balance between executive prerogative and judicial oversight in an era of rising urban disorder.
Sources: The Washington Examiner, FOX News
Spanberger’s Remarkable Admission on Illegal Border Crossings Sparks Virginia Voter Concerns
In a candid interview resurfacing amid her tight race for Virginia governor, Democrat candidate Abigail Spanberger expressed dismay that unauthorized border entries are now treated as criminal offenses under the Trump administration, calling the shift “horrifying” and suggesting it unfairly targets families seeking opportunity, a stance that overlooks longstanding federal statutes classifying such actions as misdemeanors for first offenses and felonies for repeat violations. This perspective aligns with her earlier pledge to repeal Republican Governor Glenn Youngkin’s Executive Order 47, which bolsters state cooperation with federal immigration enforcement to remove dangerous offenders from Virginia communities, a policy she deems a drain on local resources better spent on routine policing. As polls show the contest neck-and-neck, Spanberger’s comments underscore a broader Democratic reluctance to prioritize border integrity, potentially alienating voters who view robust enforcement as essential to public safety and national sovereignty, especially following the 2024 election’s clear emphasis on curbing unchecked migration that has strained resources and heightened risks across the commonwealth. Such views raise questions about whether Virginia families can afford a return to lax policies that invite disorder at the expense of orderly legal processes.
Sources: The Gateway Pundit, Townhall.com
Shutdown Chaos Hits Federal Courts: Democrats’ Shutdown Forces Furloughs and Case Backlogs
As the Democrat-induced federal government shutdown drags into its third week without resolution, the U.S. judiciary has been compelled to curtail operations starting October 20th, after depleting reserves from court fees that sustained full staffing since the funding lapse began on October 1st; this shift to bare-bones functions under the Anti-Deficiency Act means thousands of court employees, including clerks and probation officers, face furloughs or unpaid work, while judges press on with constitutional duties, potentially stalling civil and criminal proceedings amid already swollen dockets and adding to the hardships borne by over 800,000 federal workers nationwide. Local impacts are already evident, such as in northern Illinois where the Rockford federal courthouse has trimmed services, and broader concerns mount over delayed justice in high-volume districts like Houston and Chicago, where chief judges warn of mounting stress on staff and litigants alike. Legal analysts note that while jury trials and electronic filings persist, the impasse—fueled by repeated Senate rejections of House funding measures—exposes deeper flaws in legislative priorities, leaving ordinary Americans to foot the bill for partisan standoffs that erode institutional reliability.
Sources: The Washington Times, Reuters
Jack Smith Referred to DOJ for Alleged Overreach; Misconduct and Possible Disbarment
Republican lawmakers, spearheaded by Sen. Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee, have formally referred former special counsel Jack Smith to the Department of Justice’s Office of Professional Responsibility for a thorough investigation into claims of prosecutorial misconduct, including the secret acquisition of phone metadata from nine GOP members of Congress during the FBI’s 2022-2023 Arctic Frost probe into 2020 election matters—a move they argue infringed on constitutional protections like the Speech or Debate Clause and echoed past abuses of power. This action, detailed in a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi on October 16th, also urges state bar associations in Tennessee and New York to consider disbarment proceedings against Smith, whom the group accuses of leading a politically tinged “fishing expedition” that violated professional ethics by disregarding the privacy rights of elected officials without sufficient legal basis. The affected lawmakers, including Sens. Lindsey Graham, Tommy Tuberville, and others whose call logs were subpoenaed spanning January 4-7, 2021, contend this surveillance contributed to Smith’s now-dismissed federal charges against President Donald Trump, raising broader questions about the integrity of Biden-era investigations. While Smith has previously defended his work as impartial in congressional testimony and correspondence, he has offered no public reply to this latest referral, leaving the path forward in Bondi’s hands amid calls for transparency to prevent future encroachments on legislative independence.
Sources: The Washington Examiner, The Gateway Pundit
Supreme Court Upholds California School Vaccine Mandate, Rejects Religious Exemption Claim
The U.S. Supreme Court declined to grant an emergency injunction against California’s school vaccination mandate, leaving in place a policy requiring students to receive certain vaccinations without exceptions for religious beliefs. The case, brought by the group Children’s Health Defense, argued that the mandate violated First Amendment rights, but the Court’s decision aligns with precedent prioritizing public health over individual objections. Critics of the ruling express concern over diminishing religious freedoms, while supporters argue it ensures community safety in schools. The decision reinforces California’s authority to enforce its public health measures, reflecting a broader trend of judicial deference to state health policies.
Sources: The Epoch Times, The Federalist
Bari Weiss Signals Shift at CBS News with Departure of Longtime Standards Chief
In a move that underscores the evolving editorial landscape at CBS News following Paramount’s acquisition of The Free Press, standards and practices chief Claudia Milne has departed the network just weeks after Bari Weiss assumed the role of editor-in-chief, a change insiders view as an early indicator of efforts to recalibrate the division’s approach to sensitive reporting. Milne, who had overseen the unit since 2021 and was involved in decisions such as the 2023 directive restricting the use of “transgender” in coverage of the Nashville school shooting despite the perpetrator’s self-identified status, announced her exit in a farewell memo to staff, emphasizing the importance of journalists holding power to account amid challenging times. While CBS sources described the role as gradually phased out, the timing has fueled speculation that this represents Weiss’s initial step toward fostering greater journalistic integrity and balance, particularly after past controversies including blocked interviews and bias complaints that have eroded public trust in mainstream outlets. As Weiss, known for her critiques of institutional excesses and commitment to independent inquiry, settles into leadership, this development arrives alongside the appointment of a new ombudsman to address viewer concerns, suggesting a broader push to restore credibility through principled oversight rather than ideological conformity.
Sources: The New York Post, The Gateway Pundit
DON’T MISS THIS WEEK’S FEATURED COMMENTARY:
How Congressional Republicans Are Letting
Activist Judges Torpedo Trump's America First Agenda
For the love of God, can someone in the Republican Party grow a set of balls? It’s October, Trump 2.0 is in the White House fighting tooth and nail to secure our borders, slash the bloated federal bureaucracy, and rein in the runaway spending that’s bankrupting our grandkids—and what do we get from Republicans on Capitol Hill? Recess and congratulatory backslapping over the passage of one meaningful bill. Instead of reining in the rogue federal judiciary that’s turned into a one-way ratchet for Leftist obstructionism, these GOP enablers sit on their hands, pretending judicial reform—which is absolutely in their purview—is some forbidden fruit.…
Read and listen to more at UndergroundUSA.com
Trump Deploys Elite Night Stalkers to Caribbean as Maduro Mobilizes Forces
President Trump has positioned the Army’s elite 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment, the Night Stalkers, in the Caribbean as part of a measured military buildup targeting Venezuelan narco-terrorist networks tied to Nicolas Maduro’s regime, following a series of U.S. strikes that have neutralized at least 33 suspected drug traffickers over the past two months, including a recent submarine operation that left six dead and two captured. This deployment, alongside B-52 bombers, F-35 jets, and roughly 6,500 troops, underscores the administration’s commitment to disrupting drug flows into American communities while signaling to Maduro, whom Trump has branded a drug lord and illegitimate leader, that the United States will not tolerate threats to regional stability or its borders. Maduro, in response, has rallied what he claims is a millions-strong militia, deploying troops to coastlines and the Colombian border while accusing the U.S. of imperial aggression aimed at seizing Venezuela’s oil, though experts note his actual forces number around 125,000 with outdated equipment unlikely to withstand American precision capabilities. The move comes after Trump authorized CIA covert operations inside Venezuela and warned Maduro against further provocation, reflecting a strategy that prioritizes American security interests without unnecessary entanglement, as congressional voices from both parties call for clearer legal boundaries on the counter-narcotics campaign.
Sources: The Daily Mail, FOX News
Israel Withholds Rafah Reopening Until Hamas Returns All Hostage Remains
In the wake of a fragile ceasefire that has seen the release of all living Israeli hostages from Gaza captivity, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office has made clear that the vital Rafah border crossing with Egypt will stay shut until Hamas complies fully with its commitment to repatriate the bodies of the remaining deceased captives, a stance reflecting Israel’s firm resolve to hold the terrorist group accountable amid ongoing delays attributed to the rubble-strewn terrain of the war-torn enclave. This decision comes as forensic teams identified additional hostage remains handed over earlier in the week, including those of Nepalese student Bipin Joshi and elderly Israeli Eliyahu Margalit, yet with reports of at least one body mistakenly presented as an Israeli captive, heightening frustrations over Hamas’s partial fulfillment of the agreement brokered under U.S. mediation. While aid continues to enter Gaza through other routes like Kerem Shalom, the Rafah closure underscores the precarious balance in enforcing the truce’s terms, including Hamas’s disarmament and the eventual reconstruction of the territory, as families of the unreturned press for swift action to honor their loved ones without further gamesmanship from the militants.
Sources: The Straits Times, Breitbart
Danish Populists Push Aggressive Remigration Agenda to Safeguard National Identity
In a firm response to decades of unchecked immigration that has swelled Denmark’s non-Western population to over 500,000 and fueled concerns over crime, parallel societies, and cultural erosion, the Danish People’s Party has unveiled its manifesto “Danish Past, Danish Future,” advocating for systematic repatriation of migrants unwilling to fully embrace Danish norms, alongside restrictions on Islamic symbols and practices to maintain the nation’s cohesive heritage. The platform proposes revoking citizenships through rigorous retesting on language and values for grants from the past two decades, automatic stripping for criminal convictions, creation of a dedicated Repatriation Ministry, and economic pressures on origin countries to accept returnees, while prohibiting hijab use in public institutions, imposing a substantial tax or outright ban on halal products, defunding foreign-backed mosques, and shuttering Muslim independent schools to counter what it views as creeping foreign influences under the current Social Democrat-led government. With polls showing the party’s support climbing to 12 percent—positioning it as a potential kingmaker ahead of next year’s election—this outline reflects growing public sentiment for policies prioritizing Danish sovereignty and traditions over expansive multiculturalism, echoing broader European shifts toward controlled borders and cultural preservation.