President Donald Trump, in his relentless pursuit of a leaner, more efficient federal government, faces a formidable obstacle: the insidious tandem of judicial activism and anti-DOGE Democrat politicians. These forces, cloaked in sanctimonious rhetoric about "protecting workers" and "preserving institutions," are hell-bent on thwarting his agenda to downsize bloated government agencies and eliminate redundant federal jobs, not to mention fraud and graft.
The federal courts, increasingly a playground for partisan tyrants masquerading as impartial arbiters, have repeatedly overstepped their constitutional bounds to block Trump’s efforts. But Trump, more of a shrewd tactician than the far–Left suspects, has a card up his sleeve: the power to transfer non-compliant and shielded federal workers to the most undesirable corners of the country, effectively forcing them to quit. This strategy, while ruthless, could be the key to dismantling the entrenched bureaucracy and restoring accountability to a government long overrun by unelected busybodies.
The federal judiciary’s descent into unconstitutional activism has reached a fever pitch since Trump’s return to the White House. Judges, many appointed by Democrat predecessors with an eye toward preserving the administrative state, have issued injunctions and rulings that defy both logic and the will of the electorate.
Take, for instance, Trump’s push to streamline agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or the Department of Education—entities that have ballooned into inefficient behemoths, churning out regulations that stifle economic growth while employing armies of paper-pushers. When Trump moved to cut jobs and consolidate functions, the courts swooped in, citing dubiously union-centric legal theories about "worker protections" or "agency mandates." These rulings aren’t about law; they’re about power—specifically, the power of a neo-Jacobin elite to shield its Deep State bureaucratic allies from the consequences of a Trump presidency.
Meanwhile, anti-DOGE Democrats in Congress have cheered on this judicial overreach, clutching their pearls at the thought of crony political foot soldier federal workers losing their cushy gigs. These are the same politicians who decry "income inequality" while defending six-figure salaries for mid-level functionaries who spend their days drafting memos no one reads. Their hypocrisy is galling. They claim to champion the little guy, yet their real loyalty lies with the entrenched Deep State DC swamp creatures who thrive on taxpayer largesse. Together, the activist courts and their Democrat enablers have created a firewall around the administrative state, daring Trump to find a way through.
Enter the transfer gambit.
Under federal law, the President, as head of the Executive Branch, has broad authority to manage the workforce of government agencies. This includes the power to reassign employees to different locations, provided the moves align with “operational needs.” Trump could exploit this authority to target the most recalcitrant, anti-reform elements within the bureaucracy—those careerists who clog the system with resistance, leak to the press, or slow-walk directives they dislike ideologically. By transferring these malcontents to remote outposts—think desolate field offices in Alaska, rural North Dakota, the sweltering Texas border, or even Guam and American Samoa—they’d face a stark choice: uproot their lives and families to places with little appeal, or resign and seek greener pastures elsewhere. It’s a blunt instrument, to be sure, but one that could break the back of the “resistance” without firing a single shot.
The beauty of this approach lies in its legality.
The courts, for all their activism, would struggle to block such transfers. Precedents like United States v. Fausto (1988) affirm that federal personnel decisions fall squarely within Executive discretion, and judges have historically been loath to micromanage agency staffing. Even the most zealous anti-Trump jurist would find it hard to argue that a transfer to, say, a Customs Service outpost in Montana violates some sacred constitutional principle. The Democrats would howl, of course, accusing Trump of "weaponizing" his authority, but their outrage would ring hollow—after all, they’ve spent years cheering when their own presidents shuffled personnel to reward loyalists or punish dissenters.
Consider the practical impact.
The federal workforce, numbering over 2 million civilian employees, is riddled with dead weight. Agencies like the EPA employ thousands whose primary function seems to be dreaming up new ways to harass small businesses, while the redundant Department of Education churns out edicts that burden local schools without improving outcomes. Trump’s DOGE agenda aims to slash these ranks by at least 20%, saving billions and redirecting resources to priorities like border security and infrastructure. But every time he moves to cut, the courts slap injunctions, and the bureaucrats dig in, knowing their Democrat patrons have their backs.
Transfers sidestep this quagmire entirely. If a mid-level EPA drone in DC suddenly finds herself reassigned to a crumbling office inUtqiaġvik, Alaska (formerly known as Barrow), odds are she’ll quit rather than pack her snow boots. Multiply that by a few thousand, and the attrition starts to add up—quietly, efficiently, and without the legal fanfare of mass layoffs.
Critics will cry foul, claiming this tactic punishes workers for simply doing their jobs. But let’s be real: many of these "workers" aren’t serving the public—they’re serving themselves, coasting on gerrymandered job security while undermining a duly elected President.
The federal government isn’t a welfare program; it’s a tool to execute the people’s will. If employees can’t stomach Trump’s vision—voted for by a plurality of Americans, and a majority of the voters, at that—they don’t belong there. And if the courts won’t let Trump fire them outright, he’s well within his rights to make their lives uncomfortable enough to leave voluntarily, just like those self-deporting illegal immigrants now leaving the country.
The logistics are daunting but doable. The General Services Administration could identify understaffed field offices in low-demand regions—places where the cost of living is cheap but the quality of life is, shall we say, more rustic, requiring more self-sufficiency than life in an urban center. Think dying industrial towns, isolated military bases, or border zones plagued by heat and dust; poisonous snakes and scorpions.
Trump could frame these moves as "rebalancing" the federal workforce to meet national needs—say, bolstering immigration enforcement in Texas or supporting rural economic development in the Midwest. The spin writes itself: "We’re putting federal resources where they’re needed most." The courts might grumble, but they’d have little ground to intervene.
The political fallout would be fierce. Democrats would flood the airwaves with sob stories about displaced workers packing their Lexuses to leave the beltway, painting Trump as a heartless tyrant. The media, always eager to amplify the narrative, would run profiles of teary-eyed bureaucrats, venti Starbucks macchiatos in hand, forced to abandon their suburban McMansions for lesser accommodations in more “environmentally pristine” areas of our Republic.
But Trump thrives on such backlash—it’s his oxygen. He’d counter with rallies, pointing out how these "victims" were the same do-nothing government feedtrough leeches who spent years obstructing his first term. The base would eat it up, and swing voters, tired of government waste, would approvingly nod along.
The real test would be staying power. If Trump can weather the initial storm and rack up enough resignations, the bureaucracy would start to crack. Seeing their ranks thin, anti-Trump agency heads might finally get the message and fall in line with the DOGE agenda. The courts, meanwhile, would lose their leverage—hard to issue injunctions protecting jobs that no longer exist. It’s a war of attrition, and Trump’s got the stomach for it and the cards to play that hand.
In the end, this isn’t about cruelty; it’s about results. The activist courts and anti-DOGE Democrats have made it clear they’ll fight tooth and nail to preserve the Deep State bureaucratic status quo. Trump, ever the disruptor—and armed with a mandate by the American people, doesn’t have to play their game. By wielding the transfer power, he can outmaneuver the judges, outlast the bureaucrats, and deliver on his promise to drain the swamp—one remote reassignment at a time.
The American people didn’t elect him to coddle the administrative state; they elected him to tame it; to conquer it, to dismantle it. And if the courts won’t let him cut the fat, he can just ship it off to the hinterlands until it quits on its own. It’s not like the private sector doesn’t do this all the time.
Then, when we return, our segment on America’s Third Watch, broadcast nationally from our flagship station WGUL AM930 & FM93.7 in Tampa, Florida.
Democrats Cling to Delusion as America Wakes Up
I’ve said it a thousand times, and I’ll say it again: political opinion polling, for the most part, is a sham. The questions are often rigged, twisted, and sculpted to herd respondents into the answers the pollsters—often lackeys for the Left—want to hear. But when the results come back overwhelmingly lopsided, especially from outlets that usually shill for the losing side, it’s worth a second glance.
Case in point: an NBC News poll dropped on Sunday, and it’s a glorious gut punch to the sanctimonious far-Left and their Democrat puppets.
Three months into his second term, President Trump has soared to the highest approval rating of his tenure as commander-in-chief. More Americans say the country’s on the right track than at any point since 2004—back when the world wasn’t yet drowning in woke dogma and Democrat hysterics.
The survey shows voters overwhelmingly believe Trump’s delivering “the right kind of change” on the issues that matter—even tariffs, that sacred cow the Left loves to demonize. More Americans back his trade policy shake-up (41%) than whine about it (38%), per NBC’s own numbers. On border security—where the far-Left’s open-borders fetish has wreaked havoc—56% cheer Trump’s moves as a positive shift. On slashing government bloat, 47% approve, while a measly 29% cling to their big-government blankie.
Even on Ukraine and NATO—where the elitist Left and their media lapdogs have screeched nonstop—more respondents salute Trump’s approach than clutch their pearls in opposition. And inflation? The poll shows voters are giving him a pass, despite the Democrat machine’s endless bleating about economic Armageddon.
Then there’s the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk—a glorious middle finger to the wasteful, corrupt swamp the Left worships. A whopping 61% of Americans say it’s a net positive, with just 4%—probably the same granola-crunching socialists who think money grows on trees—insisting there’s no need to trim the fat. One-third (33%) want DOGE to dig deeper into the cesspool of government waste, fraud, and abuse, while 28% call it a long-overdue reckoning. That 61% steamrolls the 33% of whining Leftists who clutch their chai lattes and sob that DOGE’s cuts are “reckless and must stop.”
Trump’s still a lightning rod, no doubt. Republicans give him a 90% approval rating—deservedly so—while Democrats muster a pathetic 4%. That’s the widest partisan gap in 80 years, and it’s a neon sign flashing the intellectual bankruptcy of the Democrat Party.
Two takeaways scream for attention. First, if most voters think Trump’s steering the country in the right direction, all the Left’s venom toward him is just performative tantrum-throwing—a hissy fit over his personality, not his results. In a free nation, which we’re still clinging to despite the Left’s best efforts, you don’t have to braid friendship bracelets with someone to respect what they’re doing for you. Only the shallow, feelings-obsessed drones of the far-Left can’t grasp that.
Second, if just 4% of Democrats approve of Trump’s second-term performance while everyone else sees the light, what does that say about the Democrat Party? They’re a cult of stubborn, emotion-drunk ideologues, so blinded by their hatred they’d rather torch the country than admit he’s winning; that the American people are better off than under the neo-Marxist bullshit sold to us as “progress” in the Clinton, Obama, and Biden years.
Is America ideologically gridlocked? You bet. The far-Left and their Democrat stooges have dragged us away from facts, reason, and truth, chaining us instead to the propaganda mill of the mainstream media—the same clowns who’ve spent years peddling fear and utopian fairy tales.
But this poll? It’s a flicker of hope. Maybe, just maybe, Americans are finally rubbing the sleep from their eyes, seeing through the hollow promises of the radical Left and their Democrat mouthpieces. There’s a long road ahead to rekindle liberty’s fire in this nation, but this is a start—and as Martha Stewart might say, that’s a good thing.
.svg){kind=link}
Share this post