🎧 LISTEN TO THIS ARTICLE ON THE SUBSTACK APP
Elections may change the names on the doors and the faces in the campaign ads, but they don’t automatically change the people behind the scenes who write the legislation, control the briefing books, draft the amendments, and keep the machinery of government moving day after day. Congressional staffers and their White House counterparts form a durable professional class, one that often outlasts the officeholders they are meant to serve. And that continuity shouldn’t be mistaken for neutral expertise. It’s the operational reality of the American Fifth Column: the gradual institutional capture of the Republic through career networks, administrative insulation, and policy trajectories that keep moving across elections, no matter what the voters have just said.
Most Americans still like to believe their elected members of Congress are the ones sitting down and drafting the laws. The reality is a lot colder than that. Legislative directors, policy advisers, committee counsel, and senior staff are often the people producing the actual text of bills, the report language, and the dense regulatory provisions that most members never fully master. White House staffers play the same role on the Executive side, shaping executive orders, guidance documents, and the options that land on the desks of political appointees. Members cast the votes and give the speeches. The permanent class—the staffers—frames the choices, embeds the priorities, and ensures preferred outcomes survive the next election.
This arrangement turns corrosive when staffers begin treating ideology and institutional continuity as obligations that eclipse the voters who put their principals in office. A clear and recent example comes from Texas. Jacob Smith spent five years as Sen. John Cornyn’s (R-TX) deputy legislative director and policy adviser. Before that, he worked for Republican members on the House Science Committee and for Sen. Roger Wicker (R-MS).
But after Ken Paxton defeated Cornyn in the Republican primary runoff, Smith didn’t simply move on to another Republican office. He joined Progressive Democrat James Talarico’s Senate campaign as deputy policy director. In a statement released by the campaign, Smith urged fellow Republicans to abandon their own nominee, calling Paxton the most corrupt, self-dealing politician in Texas and saying he would sell the state’s future to the highest contributor.
Staffers don’t usually switch parties, and there’s a reason for that. When they do, it tells voters something important about where real loyalties may have been all along. Smith’s move shouldn’t be brushed aside as a lone act of personal conscience. It points to a professional class that too often treats elected Republicans as temporary vehicles for preferred policy outcomes. Once the vehicle no longer serves its purpose, the staffer simply changes cars.
But the institutional knowledge goes with him. So do the agency relationships, the lobbyist connections, and the muscle memory of how legislation actually gets moved. Voters who thought they had chosen a Republican direction discover, after the fact, that the direction was always negotiable inside the permanent networks.
You see the same pattern play out across Congress and the Executive Branch. Long-serving staffers build relationships with career bureaucrats, advocacy groups, think tanks, and the revolving door of K Street. They decide what information reaches the elected official, which stakeholders get in the room, and which data make it onto the principal’s desk. Over time, the member comes to rely heavily on the staffer’s judgment. The staffer, meanwhile, becomes the real author of much of the policy. This continuity is marketed as institutional knowledge and responsible government. In practice, it often works as insulation from the voters.
This is what The American Fifth Column looks like in practice: not a dramatic break with the system, but the patient colonization of the institutions already in place. A permanent administrative and legislative class carries preferred policy trajectories across elections, steadily replacing constitutional accountability with managerial rule. The results show up in regulatory buildup, uneven enforcement, and a shrinking space for legitimate disagreement.
Activist staffers who share the progressive assumptions that dominate Washington’s professional culture don’t have to win elections themselves. They simply have to stay put, writing the text, shaping the options, and steering the machinery while the elected politicians come and go.
Criticism is warranted because the stakes could hardly be more basic. Self-government only works if policy bends, at least in some real way, to the changing will of the people as expressed through elections. But when the people drafting the language, controlling the process, and managing the options begin treating election results as problems to be worked around, the Republic has already been partially captured. The American Fifth Column doesn’t require foreign agents lurking in trench coats. It operates through careerists who believe their expertise, relationships, and institutional networks give them the right to steer the ship even after the passengers have voted for a different course.
The Texas episode matters because it isn’t abstract, and it isn’t ancient history. Here was a staffer who spent years helping advance Republican legislative priorities from inside a senior Senate office, only to take that same institutional knowledge and turn it against the Republican nominee on behalf of a far-Left, socialist-embracing Democrat.
Texas voters didn’t hire Jacob Smith to chart their political future. They elected John Cornyn, and then Republican primary voters chose Ken Paxton. Smith’s move treats that democratic sequence as little more than a procedural inconvenience. And that mindset—the permanent interest of the managerial class overruling the temporary verdict of the ballot box—is exactly how The American Fifth Column operates day after day.
Reform starts with admitting the problem, not shrugging at it. Staffers aren’t neutral technicians quietly sharpening pencils in the background. Many are ideological actors working inside constitutional forms, and that matters.
The public deserves to know who actually writes the bills, who stays behind after the elected official leaves, and whose networks control the flow of legislation. That kind of transparency would make quiet continuity much harder to hide.
Limits on senior staff tenure, stronger member ownership of legislative text, and constant public scrutiny of the revolving door between staff jobs, agencies, lobby shops, and advocacy groups would begin to restore accountability. Without that pressure, the permanent class will keep doing its patient work—writing the rules, framing the choices, and ensuring elections change faces while the real substance of power stays safely insulated from the voters who are told they are in charge. The machinery keeps running.
The only question is: Will voters continue pretending that the operators are merely helpful staff? Or will they wake up to the tyranny of The American Fifth Column?
A Note About Subscribing:
At Underground USA, we pride ourselves on being fiercely independent—we only answer to our readers. This independence allows us to tackle tough questions, dive deep into important topics that often get overlooked, and share essays and podcasts, like this one, without asking for anyone’s approval.
Free subscriptions help us connect with a wider audience. They are the vehicle for the wide dissemination of the message. Paid subscriptions are what keep us going. They fund our research, document requests, interviews, fact-checking, and give us the time to dig deeper than just the headlines. Most importantly, they support something that’s getting harder to find: independent analysis that’s not swayed by advertisers, corporate sponsors, or political agendas.
