It’s Not About Israel Or The Jews, It’s About Islam & Islamist Conquest
In a cynical ploy that reeks of historical deception, Hamas has once again floated the specter of a temporary truce—what Islamists coyly term a Hudna—as a smokescreen for rearming and regrouping.
On December 7, 2025, Bassem Naim, a senior member of Hamas’s political bureau, told the Associated Press in Doha that the terror group is “open-minded” about “freezing or storing or laying down” its weapons for a 5-10 year ceasefire with Israel. This comes amid stalled negotiations, where Hamas insists on mere “Palestinian guarantees” against using arms during the truce, while rejecting any meaningful external oversight beyond a token UN presence at borders to “report violations.”
Naim’s words drip with feigned moderation: “We can talk about freezing... with the Palestinian guarantees, not to use it at all during this ceasefire time or truce.” Yet, this is no olive branch; it’s a classic Islamist feint, designed to buy time for the next wave of slaughter. Hamas’s defense of its October 7, 2023, massacre as a mere “act of defense” and its unyielding claim to a “right to resist” expose the farce.
Such rhetoric isn’t negotiation—it’s preparation for perpetual war.
To grasp the insidious nature of this maneuver, one must first define Hudna. Rooted in Islamic jurisprudence, Hudna refers to a truce or armistice in warfare, ostensibly allowing Muslims to pause hostilities against non-believers when facing military disadvantage. Derived from the Quran’s Surah Al-Anfal (8:61), which urges acceptance of peace if the enemy inclines toward it, Hudna is not a peace treaty but a tactical expedient. Muhammad himself employed it deceptively in 628 CE during the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah with the Quraysh tribe in Mecca. The Prophet agreed to a 10-year non-aggression pact, only to violate it two years later when his forces had grown stronger, launching a surprise conquest of Mecca. This precedent isn’t ancient history—it’s a playbook for modern jihadists.
Islamist militant groups have weaponized Hudna repeatedly to mask their genocidal ambitions:
Al-Qaeda’s Osama bin Laden invoked it in the 1990s, calling for a truce with the West to consolidate power, only to orchestrate the 9/11 attacks.
Hezbollah, Iran’s Lebanese proxy, signed a UN-brokered Hudna in 2006 after its war with Israel, using the lull to amass over 150,000 rockets supplied by Tehran—far more than before the conflict.
The Taliban pulled the same stunt in 2020 with the Doha Agreement, promising to prevent al-Qaeda attacks on the US in exchange for withdrawal; within a year, they overran Afghanistan, reinstating sharia terror and harboring global jihadists anew.
And now Hamas, fresh from butchering 1,200 Israelis in a single day of sadistic glee, dangles this “arms freeze” as if it signals reform. Naim’s caveat—no “mandates” for UN forces inside Palestinian territories—ensures Hamas retains control, free to smuggle Iranian missiles through Sudan or Qatar under the guise of “humanitarian aid.” These are not aberrations; they are the doctrine in action, where truces serve as oxygen for the fire of holy war.
At the heart of this endless cycle lies Islam’s foundational tenet: the imperative of a global caliphate, a borderless Islamic empire where the faith reigns supreme.
From its inception, Islam has been less a personal spirituality than a totalitarian blueprint for conquest, as articulated in the Quran and Hadiths. Surah Al-Tawbah (9:29) commands: “Fight those who do not believe in Allah... until they pay the jizya [poll tax] with willing submission and feel themselves subdued.” This isn’t metaphor; it’s a mandate for Dar al-Islam (House of Islam) to subsume Dar al-Harb (House of War), subjugating all other peoples and religions to dhimmitude—a second-class existence of humiliation and extortion. Christians, Jews, Hindus, and atheists: all must convert, submit, or perish.
The caliphate’s vision, revived by ISIS’s black banners and echoed in Hamas’s charter calling for Israel’s annihilation “from the river to the sea,” promises not coexistence but domination. Under sharia, women are chattel, the LGBTQ+ community is executed, and infidels fund their own oppression. Achieving this utopia requires unceasing jihad—military, demographic, and cultural—until every knee bows to Allah. To pretend otherwise is to ignore 1,400 years of invasions, from Spain to India, where mosques rose on razed temples.
This dogma animates the axis of Islamist militancy: Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran’s mullahs, and the Houthis. These aren’t fringe extremists; they are faithful sons of the Prophet’s ummah. Hamas, born of the Muslim Brotherhood (now designated a foreign terrorist organization by the US State Department), embeds its rockets in Gaza’s schools, using children as shields while chanting “Khaybar, Khaybar, O Jews!”—a reference to Muhammad’s massacre of a Jewish tribe. Hezbollah, with its 100,000-strong army, has fired thousands of missiles at Israeli civilians since October 2023, all while Iran’s ayatollahs funnel billions to proxies for “exporting the revolution.” The Houthis, Yemen’s Iran-backed zealots, hijack ships in the Red Sea not for justice but to enforce sharia on global trade, their banners proclaiming “Death to America, Death to Israel, Curse on the Jews.”
These groups will never desist; their violence is divine ordinance, not grievance. Ceasefires? Mere pit stops for resupply. Diplomacy? A veil for dawah, the doe-eyed stealth jihad of infiltration.
The only path to victory against such fanatics is complete and total triumph—demanding nothing less than unconditional surrender. Failed half-measures, like Biden’s or even Trump’s genuine Gaza proposals (which Naim dismissed as needing “clarifications”), embolden the enemy. History proves it: The Allies didn’t negotiate with Nazis; they crushed them at Normandy and Nuremberg. As an aside, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al Husseini, who aligned with Hitler, and even recruited Muslim soldiers for SS units in the Balkans (the 13th, 21st, and 23rd Waffen Mountain Divisions of the SS), never signed on to the unconditional surrender. He and his Nazis just faded into the desert.
Israel must dismantle Hamas’s tunnels, vaporize its leadership, and liberate Gaza from this cult of death, just as it did with the PLO in the 1980s. For Iran, regime change in Tehran is non-negotiable—topple the mullahs before their nuclear Hudna unleashes Armageddon. Hezbollah’s Bekaa Valley arsenal demands precision bombing, not border walls. The Houthis? Starve their ports until Sana’a flies a white flag.
Compromise with jihad is suicide; it invites the next September 11th, scaled to millions. Total victory means eradicating command structures, seizing arsenals, and deprogramming the indoctrinated—not “two-state solutions” that reward rockets with real estate.
In the end, Islam’s quest is unambiguous: to dominate the world by any means necessary—violence in the streets of the West, procreation swelling ummah ranks in Europe’s no-go zones, conversion through taqiyya’s lies in Western universities. Shortsighted containment, like Oslo’s illusions or endless UN resolutions, dooms our children to the battles we could win today.
Eradicate this dogma of conquest now, root and branch, or watch caliphates bloom on free soil. The hour is late; the jihad waits for no one.
I totally agree but you have too many idiots with their head in the sand calling out Israel for their war crimes. These people are barbarians and they know nothing else, no other purpose in their life except total conquest of everybody and with the way they are growing like bad weeds on a nice lawn, it will be very hard to reprogram them to peace.
There are countries that want Israel to stand trial for war crimes and ban them from other world functions but they don't see the writing on the wall like you just spelled out. How do you exterminate a virus without killing the host?