A Radical Marxist-Progressive Takes the Helm at NPR
National Public Radio (NPR) has recently appointed Katherine Maher as its new Chief Executive Officer. Maher is a businesswoman known for her outspoken Marxist-Progressive views. She is taking on this role at a crucial time for NPR, which is currently facing criticism for its political biases. This development has sparked significant debate about the role of publicly funded media in a politically divided America, the influence of personal beliefs on professional roles, and the impact of trust in the media.
Katherine Maher has occupied various leadership positions and has been an outspoken advocate for socialist and Marxist-progressive values. Her statements, particularly on X (formerly Twitter), have been noted for their biased advocacy and occasional controversy. Maher has consistently drawn attention to issues pertaining to social justice, climate change, and equity, positioning herself as a zealous advocate of these causes.
It has become common for public figures, including those in corporate leadership positions, to express their political affiliations more openly. However, Maher's appointment as the head of NPR is especially noteworthy because NPR is a publicly funded organization that is expected to remain unbiased in its reporting of news and current events. Maher's approach to public discourse is seen as aggressive and partisan, which raises concerns about NPR's ability to maintain impartiality under his leadership.
The Funding Controversy & Its Implications
One of the critical points of contention in Maher's appointment revolves around the funding structure of NPR.
Although it is commonly believed that NPR is funded mainly by the federal government, the organization claims that only a tiny portion of its budget comes directly from federal funds. However, indirect funding through a network of interconnected subsidies and grants is significantly larger than what is officially reported. This complicated funding arrangement is the center of the debate regarding NPR's ability to remain unbiased, particularly with a CEO who holds strong political biases.
There is a concern that Maher's political leanings could impact NPR's editorial direction. This could lead to losing listeners who value the network for its unbiased reporting. This concern is further compounded by past criticisms of NPR's aggressive shift towards a more liberal viewpoint. These criticisms have been fueled by internal and external commentaries about the network's editorial choices.
Punishment Of Whistleblower
Should See Taxpayer Funding Withheld
Case in point: Uri Berliner, a well-respected senior business editor at NPR, was at the center of a significant controversy when he was suspended without pay following a critical article he wrote for The Free Press.
In a controversial article, Berliner criticized NPR for adopting a radical progressive ideology. He suggested that some journalists within the organization were behaving like activists rather than impartial reporters. Berliner was disappointed with what he perceived as a deviation from NPR's original principles of impartiality and open-mindedness, especially in the pursuit of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI).
The fallout from Berliner’s public critique was swift and severe.
David Folkenflik, NPR's media correspondent, revealed the internal conflict and its consequences. As a result of the controversy, NPR's leadership implemented monthly internal assessments to give the impression of examining and potentially adjusting the network's editorial coverage.
In his critique, Berliner pointed out specific instances where he believed NPR exhibited a biased reporting stance. He condemned the network's coverage of the alleged Russia collusion conspiracy involving Donald Trump, criticized its handling (or lack thereof) of the Hunter Biden laptop story, and questioned the dismissal of the Wuhan lab leak theory related to the origins of COVID-19.
Additionally, Berlin is of the opinion that NPR tends to concentrate on peripheral issues, like the unfounded accusation of systemic racism and movements to rename birds with names that are deemed racially insensitive. He also pointed out the renaming of bird species formerly named after controversial figures, using it as a metaphor for the organization's hypersensitivity and alignment with extremist ideological leanings.
After Berliner's harsh criticism, Maher promptly denounced his conduct and language as "highly disrespectful, damaging, and degrading." Maher's forceful rejection reflected the profound disagreements between NPR's leadership and certain employees regarding the organization's objectives and values.
Berliner was summarily suspended without pay. He has since resigned, stating he “cannot work in a newsroom where I am disparaged by a new CEO whose divisive views confirm the very problems at NPR I cite in my Free Press essay.”
Maher’s Progressive Stance: Impact & Reception
Maher has not been shy about her viewpoints on various social issues, from climate change to social justice. As reported by Upward News:
Maher described herself as “someone with cis white mobility privilege,” and said America is “addicted to white supremacy.”
She was also angry to see white men flying in business class.
Maher appears to have refused to have kids due to her fears of climate change.
She once critiqued Hillary Clinton for using the terms “boy and girl” because it was harmful to people who think they are non-binary, and apologized for saying “identity as women.”
She once predicted that “driving will be the new smoking” in terms of public acceptance, based on her views of climate change.
Her bold predictions and criticisms of mainstream social norms highlight her Marxist-progressive thinking and polarizing perspective. These positions, while resonating with a small segment of the far-Left extremist demographic, often draw ire from those who see them as overly zealous and disconnected from mainstream values.
Her outspoken and extremist stances position her as a figurehead in the aggressive and often unyieldingly caustic Marxist-progressive movement, which is contentious in today's political climate. Such views, while part of a broader neo-progressive discourse, are exceptionally provocative when associated with the leader of a media organization that is expected to maintain ideological and political neutrality.
Maher on ‘Truth’
A specific example of Maher’s morally relativistic, Marxist-progressive mindset comes in her embrace of the existence of “individual truths.”
During a TED Talk, Maher recounted her time as executive director of Wikimedia and her thoughts on “truth”:
"...Perhaps, for our most tricky disagreements, seeking the truth, and seeking to convince others of the truth, might not be the right place to start. In fact, our reverence for the truth might be a distraction that’s getting in the way of finding common ground and getting things done. Now, that is not to say that the truth does not exist, nor is it to say that the truth isn't important. Clearly, the search for the truth has led us to do great things, to learn great things. But I think if I were to really ask you to think about this, one of the things we could all acknowledge is that part of the reason we have such glorious chronicles of the human experience and all forms of culture is because we acknowledge that there are many different truths. And so, in the spirit of that, I'm certain that the truth exists for you, and probably for the person sitting next to you. But this may not be the same truth. This is because the truth of the matter is very often for many people. What happens when we merge facts about the world with our beliefs about the world? So we all have different truths..."
Media Trust & Political Polarization
Trust in media has been declining in the United States, particularly among centrist and conservative audiences. The appointment of a CEO who holds Marxist-progressive views may worsen this lack of trust, reinforcing the belief that mainstream media outlets are becoming more disconnected from the majority of the population.
The broader societal implications of Maher's appointment and the ensuing debate are significant. In an era where media polarization is often seen as reflective of and contributing to broader political divisions, the leadership of major media institutions should be scrutinized for potential biases that could adversely and biasedly shape public discourse. The fear is that as institutions like NPR – as well as the total of the mainstream media complex – conduct their business with increasing social and political biases through partisan lenses, their ability to function as uniting and legitimate platforms for national dialogue diminishes.
As Maher assumes leadership at NPR, the challenges she faces are manifold. Given her outspokenness, reserving her personal convictions in deference to her responsibilities to uphold NPR’s editorial impartiality will be almost impossible. How she navigates these waters will have consequences for NPR's relationship with its national audience.
Furthermore, Maher's leadership comes when the media's societal role is intensely debated. The expectations are high, and her ability to manage these dynamics while promoting an impartial, non-partisan, and cohesive editorial policy – devoid of ideological propaganda, will be crucial in determining the future trajectory of NPR and its place in the national dialogue.
Katherine Maher's appointment as CEO of NPR is a significant development in the media landscape, reflecting the ongoing debates about media impartiality, funding, and trust.
This controversy brings to the fore crucial questions about free speech and the role of the media in safeguarding or undermining it. Critics argue that the suppression of dissenting voices within media organizations or in their coverage can lead to a form of censorship.
This, coupled with the subjective nature of some mainstream media reporting, contributes to the continued and increasing limitation on free speech, codifying the media as de facto propagandists for the ideologies they favor.
With each thrust of the mainstream media complex’s sword into the neck of free speech – of which Maher appears to be complicit, the United States and the free world come closer to relegating freedom itself to the ash heap of history. It is our obligation to circumvent this at all costs.
“Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.” – Ronald Reagan
Take Back Your Mind
Think For Yourself