The American people -- and the people of the free world -- dodged a bullet in the last General Election when Hillary Clinton lost. Would she have won it's clear we would be looking at an explosion of nuclear weapons capability across the Middle East.
Clinton, in only the way an American-hating globalist can, has somehow twisted the negation of the hideously inequitable Iran nuclear deal made under the Obama administration with United States credibility around the world.
"That is bad not just on the merits for this particular situation, but it sends a message across the globe that America's word is not good," said Clinton. "This particular president is, I think, upending the kind of trust and credibility of the United States' position and negotiation that is imperative to maintain."
So, the Obama-Clinton team negotiates a deal that literally facilitates Iran's continued development of nuclear weapons and that somehow validates our nation's "credibility" on the world stage. But the negation of that piss-poor agreement -- a negation that very much makes the world a safer place -- damages our national credibility? Seriously?
It is abundantly clear that the Progressive-Left, anchored by Alinsky-ites like Obama and Clinton, not only came very close to permanently destroying the ability of the United States to be a major player in defending freedom, but that they are -- regardless of being out of power to a certain extent -- willing to defend the endangerment of the world at their hand.
Why Hillary Clinton is still relevant is a quandary. She has proven herself to be a horrible leader, a self-serving politician, a corrupt individual, and pathetically sore loser. She is everything that is wrong with the modern "Selfish Age," and for the good of the country we need to put that age out to pasture.