SOURCE: FOX NEWS
This predicament is one that feeds into the border security issue. With this realization it becomes wholly irresponsible to oppose any elevated vetting and advanced border protection measures. Should Democrats, liberals and Progressives continue their opposition to enhanced vetting and border security measures, the blood of the next 9/11 is on their hands.
Have you heard the name Linda Sarsour? If you have a grimace probably just came over your face. Sarsour is one of the most disingenuous political parasites of modern times. Now, this opportunistic fraud is diverting funds from the victims of Hurricane Harvey.
Sarsour was one of the minor players in organizing the vagina-hat march against Donald Trump in the early days of his presidency. This was the march with Madonna saying she often thinks about blowing up the White House (interesting since the eight years before Trump saw the White House occupied by Barack Obama) and Ashley Judd spewing rhetoric that should have mandated her a trip to a psychiatrist. Sarsour glommed on to the event as is she had given birth to it. She did not.
Sarsour is vehemently anti-Israel and foaming-at-the-mouth pro-Palestinian. She is a proponent of advancing Sharia Law into the West. She injected Muslim activism into the Ferguson issue and rebuked then-President Obama who reluctantly called on the Muslim community to denounce those who executed the attacks in San Bernardino, California; attacks perpetrated by Islamofascists. She has, since her showboating at the vagina-hat march, attached her self, opportunistically, to the Black Lives Matter movement, the immigration issue, the Confederate statue issue, you name it, if it's a Progressive anti-American cause, this charlatan is there.
Now, Legal Insurrection reports that in the aftermath of Hurricane Harvey, this fraud is misdirecting people on social media who want to help the flood victims. In a tweet, Sansour directs potential donors to political action groups (PACs) with which she is affiliated. These are community organizing PACs dedicated to Progressive social justice initiatives. They have absolutely nothing to do with providing much needed financial aid to victims of Hurricane Harvey; people who need - in the immediate - food, clothing, water, emergency shelter, etc.
This is why the overwhelming majority of thinking Americans despise the Progressive-Left. They are an ideological gaggle of deceivers who prey on people's emotions even as they defraud those they have manipulated, both intellectually and monetarily.
Sarsour, a typical Progressive-Left activist, is beneath contempt for her dishonesty. Even in Allah's afterlife, this woman is going to burn.
Donald Trump did not defend neo-Nazis or the Ku Klux Klan in his rebuke of violence in Charlottesville, Virginia. Of course, you wouldn't know that from the incredibly disingenuous coverage of the event and the ensuing ideologically motivated blathering from the over-paid and increasingly irrelevant chattering class.
The truth of the matter is this. Trump denounce the violence in total that occurred in Charlottesville and that is, indeed, enough. He denounced violence, bigotry and racism as it was perpetrated by each and every person -- regardless of color, religion and/or ideology -- attending the event. That is the correct thing to do.
The victimhood class -- opportunistic ideologues, one and all, are blind to the absolute fact that one cannot view history through the lens of the modern era. The real-time situations of times gone by are impossible to fathom from a modern day vantage point. So too, we, today, are not privileged to the societal conversations of eras past.
To wit, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, George Washington and, later, even Robert E. Lee were all abolitionists; they wanted to end slavery understanding it to be an abomination. Jefferson even wrote abolition into the Declaration of Independence only to have to remove the measure lest the whole of independence be relegated to the trash can. Nevertheless, it was something that was sought after for these men until the days they died.
This reality -- this truth -- is lost on the activist masses, even while it is obscured by those fanning the flames of division. The only reason these people can be led down this untruthful path is because Progressives have expunged the need for US History education in our schools.
Another truth not being exposed is the disingenuous duplicity of the mainstream media. As they condemn the neo-Nazis and white supremacists who attended the rally in Charlottesville (they had a legal permit to march and assemble, by the by), they refuse to condemn -- equally and with the same gusto -- the non-permitted Antifa, Black Lives Matter and anarchist groups who descended on the rally in full battle gear. The very fact that they were wearing battle gear indicates they meant to do violence; their violence was premeditated..
As I wrote in a recent syndicated column:
"Disagreement is going to happen in a free society. It’s how members of that society engage in disagreements that define whether they are an advanced society or an adolescent society. Sadly...we are devolving from an emotional and intellectually advanced society (circa the Civil Rights movement) to an adolescent society where violence and censorship are deemed acceptable tools to employ in disagreements."
There have always been ignoramuses in society. They are the fringe, but a by-product of freedom itself. I classify the neo-Nazi and white supremacist activists in this category. But Antifa is a special kind of dangerous. They are tools of the hardcore ideological Left, employed to bring about the chaos and anarchy that has successfully brought about violent revolutions in lesser nations. They are, rightfully, classified as a domestic terror group.
We can argue about commemorating history, and I, personally, believe that any erasure of history -- offensive to some or not -- is abhorrent; it is the stuff of the Islamic State.. But violent censorship and coercion, the likes of what Antifa and the Left are executing, must be met definitively by law enforcement and the rule of law.
It is time to make examples of those who piss on our laws and those who risk their lives to enforce it. Then we need to return to educating our children on accurate US History, not the bullsh*t Progressives are shopping to us.
Remember that $11.9 billion that the Obama Administration paid to the Iranian mullahs via that oh-so-spectacular Iranian nuke deal? You remember, the deal that John Kerry and all the other globalist Progressive toadies defended ad nauseum? Do you know what Iran is doing with that money? They are sending it to Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad and Hamas terrorists.
Israeli Defense Forces Military Intelligence chief Maj. Gen. Hertzi Halevi said Wednesday that Iran is funding Hezbollah to the tune of $75 million a year, while paying $50 million towards Hamas’s budget, and approximately $70 million to Islamic Jihad.
At that rate, the Obama Administration - through its payment to the mullahs - will be sustaining these contributions to these terrorist organizations for over fifty years!
These facts, as presented, pose a very serious question. How can anyone from the Obama Administration claim they were engaged in the war against Islamofascist aggression when they have literally funded three of the most potent Islamist terror groups on the planet?
Additionally, why are news organizations -- including FOX News -- employing people from the Obama Administration to provide any kind of argument regarding the issues of the Middle East when everyone signed on to this abhorrent move to fund terrorist organizations? They simply must be seen as plants for the advancement of Islamofascism at this point.
It's time we got away from the constant drone of argumentative journalism anyway. No one learns anything from the fake "debate" set-ups that is currently the formula of every cable news channel. It is time to get back to informative, functionally educational, and investigative journalism that uses established facts as a base.
That said, an expose into the Obama Administration and how their policies benefited the Islamofascist movement would be a grand idea. Don't hold your breath for MSNBC or CNN to move on this idea...
We like to say that we are in the information age. We point to the Internet and claim that anyone with even cursory technical skills can find anything on the Internet. But when it comes down to critical issues like the attack in Manchester by Islamofascist barbarians this claim doesn't hold water.
Michelle Malkin writes a particularly poignant piece about having a truthful, fact-based video short on her YouTube channel banned by the Progressive moderators at YouTube. She contrasts that with YouTube allowing for grotesque hate being spewed forth by Islamofascists like Ahmad Musa Jibril, "whose bloodthirsty rants." Malkin writes, "against non-Muslims reportedly inspired the London Bridge ringleader."
My original publication, The New Media Journal, suffered a similar fate via a banning from Google News and, eventually, the whole of the Google search platform. Our crime: explaining what "jihad" meant and giving examples. They called it "hate speech."
Yet, ISIS abuses the Internet through both platforms and barbarians like Jibril have a hateful presence on YouTube...countered by banned videos.
The First Amendment was meant to keep the government from infringing on the citizenry's right to free speech; our right to redress government. Since the Framer's days the "free speech" right has expanded. But in recent times, Progressives have concocted "hate speech" and created laws to censor speech.
Behemoths like Google, and through their ownership YouTube, have taken to censoring speech on their platforms based on their political ideology. They get to do this because they are not mandated by the First Amendment to grant the public free speech rights.
Something has to change. The information highway is patrolled by the censorship police. The Nazis were as bad.
A British CNN analyst - and we have to use that term in the loosest of terms - covering the recent Islamic State attack on innocents in Manchester, made sure to inject the Progressive required moral relativism into his take by saying the attack could have been a "false-flag plot" executed by "right-wing extremists."
Even the remotely intellectual have come to understand that right-wing extremists do not operate in the way Islamofascist terrorists do. The idea that right-wing radicals would seek to target children at a concert is completely outside of their traditional modus operandi. But Progressives have to float that "possibility" in order to marginalize the evil of Islamofascists.
Until there is loud and constant outrage about statements like this that only end with the termination of such imbeciles and activists, we will continue to hear apology after apology from the talking elitists in the media about Islamofascist violence.
We will continue to hear from these intellectually challenged mental troglodytes that Islam is a "religion of peace" when, in fact, Islam is a "religion of pieces."
Europe, including the UK and Russia, have witnessed instances of terror plots and/or attacks every nine days on average in 2017. This represents an enormous spike in violent jihadist activity on the Continent.
Attacks and thwarted attacks have taken place in Austria, France, the United Kingdom, Belgium, Italy, Russia, Sweden, Norway, and Germany. Further, 14 Islamofascist terror attacks have occurred in Turkey, a NATO member country currently vying for European Union membership.
Only the truly ignorant can blindly ignore that Islamofascists have declared war on the West, and are waging that war on the European Continent. Further, only those crippled by the lunacy of political correctness can ignore that Islamofascists have used the refugee crisis to literally infiltrate the lands and cultures they intend to conquer.
Truth is often a reality best served raw and cold. Islam has a gigantic problem and that problem is the demographic who follows its barbaric tenets to the letter. Islam is in desperate need of religious reformation and the only people who can affect that reformation are Muslims themselves.
This task is difficult when the controlling Imams insist that the Quran is the literal word of God because that means anyone seeking to reform the dogma would necessarily be deemed an apostate, punishable by death in the Quran.
So, it comes down to how courageous the peace-loving Muslim community is...and right now there is no courage to be seen.
A lawsuit has been filed in a federal court in California charging Google, Facebook and Twitter for "helping to cause" the 2015 terror attack in San Bernardino that left 14 dead.
The suit was filed on behalf of the families of three of those killed in the San Bernardino attack, which mirrors similar suits filed by the same law firm in cases involving terror attacks in Dallas, TX, and Orlando, FL. The argument is that plaintiffs say the social media giants failed to adequately scrub Islamic State propaganda messages that inspired the terror attacks.
These lawsuits - which, on th surface, present as nuisance lawsuits meant to glean easy money from the social media sphere - have everything to do with the First Amendment to the US Constitution and the Progressive notion of "hate speech."
While inciting violence is against the law - and instructing others how to commit acts of terrorism is inciting violence in the extreme, these lawsuits would have to prove beyond any doubt that the terrorists in each instance acted solely on the content found on the social media websites. There is so much Islamofascist propaganda call-to-arms floating on the Internet that this would be almost impossible to do.
And while Islamofascist propaganda certainly qualifies as "hate speech," the whole of society would have to acknowledge that this same "propaganda" is readily available at your local neighborhood mosque. This acknowledgment would necessarily mandate Quranic teaching as hate speech and the Islamist culture as a culture of hate, exploding the Progressive meme that Islam is a religion of peace.
These lawsuits are either frivolous, a a stroke of genius...
Police said Kori Ali Muhammad, the man who killed three people on a shooting spree in downtown Fresno, Calif., on Tuesday while shouting "Allahu Akbar", wanted to kill as many white people as possible and that the crime was not terrorism related.
Fresno Police Chief Jerry Dyer said, Muhammad shouted "Allahu Akbar," but that the shootings had "nothing to do with terrorism in spite of the statement he made...This is solely based on race."
This is shear and wanton denial of evidence presented directly in front of Dyer's face. As they say, facts are stubborn things and you can't change the facts, no matter how badly you want to see them through your own ideological lenses.
Was the shooting a racist act? Yes, Muhammad;s targeting of White people only bears that out with stark clarity. But his declaration of triumph in shouting "Allahu Akbar" makes his crimes acts that engage in and support the global Islamofascism jihad against the West; against the free world. Muhammad;s acts were both racist and Islamofascist.
The madness of Progressive political correctness is leading some to making the most contrived of statements about a "religion" that has yet to go through a reformation to expel violence from its tenets. Every other Great Religion has done so. Islam has not. Until such time Islam is not a Great Religion, but a creed that used to advance global domination.
The longer we deny the truth as mandated by facts, the longer we remain susceptible to murderous Islamofascists like Muhammad.
On April 4, South Sudan government militias loyal to the president, Salva Kiir Mayardit, entered the town of Pajok and began killing and raping men, women and children who were not part of the dominant Dinka tribe. Opposition forces led by the former first vice president estimate that more than 200 innocent civilians were killed.
These atrocities - easily considered crimes against humanity - are happening with the full knowledge of international bodies, including the UN, the African Union and the Troika, which includes United States, the UK and Norway.
And while the bleeding-heart Progressives in the West - especially in the United States - continue their campaign to force nations to accept "refugees" from war-torn Middle Eastern countries (i.e. Syria, Iraq, etc.), nary a peep is uttered about the victims of a true genocide in South Sudan.
I am not suggesting that we add the genocide victims of South Sudan into the "refugee relocation program," but I am suggesting that we - the United States and the West as a whole - re-evaluate how we go about aiding the threatened and oppressed in areas like Syria, Iraq and South Sudan.
Relocating people to distant lands where their cultures are foreign is a fool's errand. It doesn't create diversity, it creates confrontation and resentment. We need to craft policies and actions that allows these people to exist in their own lands while conflict resolutions are enacted.
Imagine Russia deciding for us that they were going to "relocate" "refugees" from the US South during the US Civil War...