Think about this...or should I say, how is this for a jump point to who knows what and with what influence on a global scale.
In a realm of anonymity online, unless identified, this leads into the world of gray and black messaging and attribution. Granted, this discussion is already taking place in multiple realms against other nation states, but when looking at warfare, in its true asymmetric way, this is another avenue of approach in operational preparation of the environment.
Get ahead of the message and own the message...
Government officials in Afghanistan are reporting that more than 40 people were killed after Taliban terrorists assaulted the Intercontinental Hotel in Afghanistan's capital, Kabul, Saturday. This leads to a question: How are they able to do this?
The United States and an international coalition have been battling the Taliban and its affiliated forces since just after the 9/11 attacks. In the years before Barack Obama assumed the presidency, the Taliban had its back against the wall; existing far more decimated than when battling the Russians in the 1980s and 1990s.
Today, the Taliban can strike at the heart of the capitol city in Afghanistan and do so targeting a location that is allegedly heavily guarded to protect foreign diplomats and business people.
Two points come to mind at this reality. First, the Afghan military/Security Forces and intelligence mechanisms are infiltrated with Taliban sympathizers who afford critical security information to that terrorist group. And second, we have declared a modicum of success prematurely.
If this reality is not dealt with more effectively; if the Taliban is allowed to strengthen again to the levels pre-9/11, the next strike on our soil - or in the free world - will make 9/11 look like a traffic accident!
The citizens of Hawaii started their day Saturday with a message that a ballistic missile attack on their islands was imminent. Thankfully, it was a test message gone horribly wrong. It really should stop and make us think.
My sister lives in Hawaii. Immediately after the false alarm was issued my immediate family's text messaging lit up. We here on the mainland were confused. My sister was terrified at the thought of having to say goodbye to her family in short order. The thought is chilling.
Hawaiian officials have since apologized for the error and put in place redundancy systems for verification for both tests and actual alerts. Politicians will, no doubt, bleed this issue to justify investigations so they can say they did something in the aftermath.
This event brings to the forefront the reality of how Israelis live every single day. They live in proximity to countries and populations who pledge to them a fiery death, if not daily, every Friday at massive rallies, mostly sponsored by their governments. And some of those countries are now nuclear capable.
One has to wonder. If Americans had to live each day under the threat that Hawaiians felt on Saturday, would we tolerate it for very long? Or would we insist that our leaders eliminate that threat so we might live in peace?
Think about that the next time you hear some jackass politician claiming that Israelis should just suck it up and tolerate their aggressive neighbors. They live with the fear the Hawaiians felt Saturday for 45 minutes every day, all day and night.
SOURCE: FOX NEWS
President Trump did the right thing. The duly-elected Israeli government recognizes Jerusalem as the capitol of their nation. But for years, especially during the Obama Administration, the United State refused to acknowledge the city as Israel's capitol. That ended today.
President Trump, much to his credit, has acquiesced to the fact that Israel is a sovereign nation; a nation whose government can declare its own capitol. That the rest of the world, and the pathetically anti-Israel United Nations, should have any say at all over where Israel decides to establish its capitol is insane.
The fact of the matter is this. The root of the word Palestine is "philistine"; a people, not a land. In fact, it is the scriptures of the Jews that even afford the Philistines with an area, mostly accepted to be fluid and without fixed borders. That modern-day Palestinians claim Jerusalem as their capitol is antagonistic.
In the end, and for today's argument, the world must recognize Israeli sovereignty and their claim to Jerusalem as their capitol. If to the victors go the spoils, then the Israelis have a right to land they have already ceded back to their aggressor enemies. They could have kept it all after the many wars they have suffered at the hands of neighboring lands. It is time aggressors toward Israel in that region -- and around the world -- recognize Israeli sovereignty and end the Palestinians' false claim to Israeli land.
SOURCE: FOX NEWS
This predicament is one that feeds into the border security issue. With this realization it becomes wholly irresponsible to oppose any elevated vetting and advanced border protection measures. Should Democrats, liberals and Progressives continue their opposition to enhanced vetting and border security measures, the blood of the next 9/11 is on their hands.
Have you heard the name Linda Sarsour? If you have a grimace probably just came over your face. Sarsour is one of the most disingenuous political parasites of modern times. Now, this opportunistic fraud is diverting funds from the victims of Hurricane Harvey.
Sarsour was one of the minor players in organizing the vagina-hat march against Donald Trump in the early days of his presidency. This was the march with Madonna saying she often thinks about blowing up the White House (interesting since the eight years before Trump saw the White House occupied by Barack Obama) and Ashley Judd spewing rhetoric that should have mandated her a trip to a psychiatrist. Sarsour glommed on to the event as is she had given birth to it. She did not.
Sarsour is vehemently anti-Israel and foaming-at-the-mouth pro-Palestinian. She is a proponent of advancing Sharia Law into the West. She injected Muslim activism into the Ferguson issue and rebuked then-President Obama who reluctantly called on the Muslim community to denounce those who executed the attacks in San Bernardino, California; attacks perpetrated by Islamofascists. She has, since her showboating at the vagina-hat march, attached her self, opportunistically, to the Black Lives Matter movement, the immigration issue, the Confederate statue issue, you name it, if it's a Progressive anti-American cause, this charlatan is there.
Now, Legal Insurrection reports that in the aftermath of Hurricane Harvey, this fraud is misdirecting people on social media who want to help the flood victims. In a tweet, Sansour directs potential donors to political action groups (PACs) with which she is affiliated. These are community organizing PACs dedicated to Progressive social justice initiatives. They have absolutely nothing to do with providing much needed financial aid to victims of Hurricane Harvey; people who need - in the immediate - food, clothing, water, emergency shelter, etc.
This is why the overwhelming majority of thinking Americans despise the Progressive-Left. They are an ideological gaggle of deceivers who prey on people's emotions even as they defraud those they have manipulated, both intellectually and monetarily.
Sarsour, a typical Progressive-Left activist, is beneath contempt for her dishonesty. Even in Allah's afterlife, this woman is going to burn.
Donald Trump did not defend neo-Nazis or the Ku Klux Klan in his rebuke of violence in Charlottesville, Virginia. Of course, you wouldn't know that from the incredibly disingenuous coverage of the event and the ensuing ideologically motivated blathering from the over-paid and increasingly irrelevant chattering class.
The truth of the matter is this. Trump denounce the violence in total that occurred in Charlottesville and that is, indeed, enough. He denounced violence, bigotry and racism as it was perpetrated by each and every person -- regardless of color, religion and/or ideology -- attending the event. That is the correct thing to do.
The victimhood class -- opportunistic ideologues, one and all, are blind to the absolute fact that one cannot view history through the lens of the modern era. The real-time situations of times gone by are impossible to fathom from a modern day vantage point. So too, we, today, are not privileged to the societal conversations of eras past.
To wit, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, George Washington and, later, even Robert E. Lee were all abolitionists; they wanted to end slavery understanding it to be an abomination. Jefferson even wrote abolition into the Declaration of Independence only to have to remove the measure lest the whole of independence be relegated to the trash can. Nevertheless, it was something that was sought after for these men until the days they died.
This reality -- this truth -- is lost on the activist masses, even while it is obscured by those fanning the flames of division. The only reason these people can be led down this untruthful path is because Progressives have expunged the need for US History education in our schools.
Another truth not being exposed is the disingenuous duplicity of the mainstream media. As they condemn the neo-Nazis and white supremacists who attended the rally in Charlottesville (they had a legal permit to march and assemble, by the by), they refuse to condemn -- equally and with the same gusto -- the non-permitted Antifa, Black Lives Matter and anarchist groups who descended on the rally in full battle gear. The very fact that they were wearing battle gear indicates they meant to do violence; their violence was premeditated..
As I wrote in a recent syndicated column:
"Disagreement is going to happen in a free society. It’s how members of that society engage in disagreements that define whether they are an advanced society or an adolescent society. Sadly...we are devolving from an emotional and intellectually advanced society (circa the Civil Rights movement) to an adolescent society where violence and censorship are deemed acceptable tools to employ in disagreements."
There have always been ignoramuses in society. They are the fringe, but a by-product of freedom itself. I classify the neo-Nazi and white supremacist activists in this category. But Antifa is a special kind of dangerous. They are tools of the hardcore ideological Left, employed to bring about the chaos and anarchy that has successfully brought about violent revolutions in lesser nations. They are, rightfully, classified as a domestic terror group.
We can argue about commemorating history, and I, personally, believe that any erasure of history -- offensive to some or not -- is abhorrent; it is the stuff of the Islamic State.. But violent censorship and coercion, the likes of what Antifa and the Left are executing, must be met definitively by law enforcement and the rule of law.
It is time to make examples of those who piss on our laws and those who risk their lives to enforce it. Then we need to return to educating our children on accurate US History, not the bullsh*t Progressives are shopping to us.
Remember that $11.9 billion that the Obama Administration paid to the Iranian mullahs via that oh-so-spectacular Iranian nuke deal? You remember, the deal that John Kerry and all the other globalist Progressive toadies defended ad nauseum? Do you know what Iran is doing with that money? They are sending it to Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad and Hamas terrorists.
Israeli Defense Forces Military Intelligence chief Maj. Gen. Hertzi Halevi said Wednesday that Iran is funding Hezbollah to the tune of $75 million a year, while paying $50 million towards Hamas’s budget, and approximately $70 million to Islamic Jihad.
At that rate, the Obama Administration - through its payment to the mullahs - will be sustaining these contributions to these terrorist organizations for over fifty years!
These facts, as presented, pose a very serious question. How can anyone from the Obama Administration claim they were engaged in the war against Islamofascist aggression when they have literally funded three of the most potent Islamist terror groups on the planet?
Additionally, why are news organizations -- including FOX News -- employing people from the Obama Administration to provide any kind of argument regarding the issues of the Middle East when everyone signed on to this abhorrent move to fund terrorist organizations? They simply must be seen as plants for the advancement of Islamofascism at this point.
It's time we got away from the constant drone of argumentative journalism anyway. No one learns anything from the fake "debate" set-ups that is currently the formula of every cable news channel. It is time to get back to informative, functionally educational, and investigative journalism that uses established facts as a base.
That said, an expose into the Obama Administration and how their policies benefited the Islamofascist movement would be a grand idea. Don't hold your breath for MSNBC or CNN to move on this idea...
We like to say that we are in the information age. We point to the Internet and claim that anyone with even cursory technical skills can find anything on the Internet. But when it comes down to critical issues like the attack in Manchester by Islamofascist barbarians this claim doesn't hold water.
Michelle Malkin writes a particularly poignant piece about having a truthful, fact-based video short on her YouTube channel banned by the Progressive moderators at YouTube. She contrasts that with YouTube allowing for grotesque hate being spewed forth by Islamofascists like Ahmad Musa Jibril, "whose bloodthirsty rants." Malkin writes, "against non-Muslims reportedly inspired the London Bridge ringleader."
My original publication, The New Media Journal, suffered a similar fate via a banning from Google News and, eventually, the whole of the Google search platform. Our crime: explaining what "jihad" meant and giving examples. They called it "hate speech."
Yet, ISIS abuses the Internet through both platforms and barbarians like Jibril have a hateful presence on YouTube...countered by banned videos.
The First Amendment was meant to keep the government from infringing on the citizenry's right to free speech; our right to redress government. Since the Framer's days the "free speech" right has expanded. But in recent times, Progressives have concocted "hate speech" and created laws to censor speech.
Behemoths like Google, and through their ownership YouTube, have taken to censoring speech on their platforms based on their political ideology. They get to do this because they are not mandated by the First Amendment to grant the public free speech rights.
Something has to change. The information highway is patrolled by the censorship police. The Nazis were as bad.
A British CNN analyst - and we have to use that term in the loosest of terms - covering the recent Islamic State attack on innocents in Manchester, made sure to inject the Progressive required moral relativism into his take by saying the attack could have been a "false-flag plot" executed by "right-wing extremists."
Even the remotely intellectual have come to understand that right-wing extremists do not operate in the way Islamofascist terrorists do. The idea that right-wing radicals would seek to target children at a concert is completely outside of their traditional modus operandi. But Progressives have to float that "possibility" in order to marginalize the evil of Islamofascists.
Until there is loud and constant outrage about statements like this that only end with the termination of such imbeciles and activists, we will continue to hear apology after apology from the talking elitists in the media about Islamofascist violence.
We will continue to hear from these intellectually challenged mental troglodytes that Islam is a "religion of peace" when, in fact, Islam is a "religion of pieces."
Europe, including the UK and Russia, have witnessed instances of terror plots and/or attacks every nine days on average in 2017. This represents an enormous spike in violent jihadist activity on the Continent.
Attacks and thwarted attacks have taken place in Austria, France, the United Kingdom, Belgium, Italy, Russia, Sweden, Norway, and Germany. Further, 14 Islamofascist terror attacks have occurred in Turkey, a NATO member country currently vying for European Union membership.
Only the truly ignorant can blindly ignore that Islamofascists have declared war on the West, and are waging that war on the European Continent. Further, only those crippled by the lunacy of political correctness can ignore that Islamofascists have used the refugee crisis to literally infiltrate the lands and cultures they intend to conquer.
Truth is often a reality best served raw and cold. Islam has a gigantic problem and that problem is the demographic who follows its barbaric tenets to the letter. Islam is in desperate need of religious reformation and the only people who can affect that reformation are Muslims themselves.
This task is difficult when the controlling Imams insist that the Quran is the literal word of God because that means anyone seeking to reform the dogma would necessarily be deemed an apostate, punishable by death in the Quran.
So, it comes down to how courageous the peace-loving Muslim community is...and right now there is no courage to be seen.
A lawsuit has been filed in a federal court in California charging Google, Facebook and Twitter for "helping to cause" the 2015 terror attack in San Bernardino that left 14 dead.
The suit was filed on behalf of the families of three of those killed in the San Bernardino attack, which mirrors similar suits filed by the same law firm in cases involving terror attacks in Dallas, TX, and Orlando, FL. The argument is that plaintiffs say the social media giants failed to adequately scrub Islamic State propaganda messages that inspired the terror attacks.
These lawsuits - which, on th surface, present as nuisance lawsuits meant to glean easy money from the social media sphere - have everything to do with the First Amendment to the US Constitution and the Progressive notion of "hate speech."
While inciting violence is against the law - and instructing others how to commit acts of terrorism is inciting violence in the extreme, these lawsuits would have to prove beyond any doubt that the terrorists in each instance acted solely on the content found on the social media websites. There is so much Islamofascist propaganda call-to-arms floating on the Internet that this would be almost impossible to do.
And while Islamofascist propaganda certainly qualifies as "hate speech," the whole of society would have to acknowledge that this same "propaganda" is readily available at your local neighborhood mosque. This acknowledgment would necessarily mandate Quranic teaching as hate speech and the Islamist culture as a culture of hate, exploding the Progressive meme that Islam is a religion of peace.
These lawsuits are either frivolous, a a stroke of genius...
Police said Kori Ali Muhammad, the man who killed three people on a shooting spree in downtown Fresno, Calif., on Tuesday while shouting "Allahu Akbar", wanted to kill as many white people as possible and that the crime was not terrorism related.
Fresno Police Chief Jerry Dyer said, Muhammad shouted "Allahu Akbar," but that the shootings had "nothing to do with terrorism in spite of the statement he made...This is solely based on race."
This is shear and wanton denial of evidence presented directly in front of Dyer's face. As they say, facts are stubborn things and you can't change the facts, no matter how badly you want to see them through your own ideological lenses.
Was the shooting a racist act? Yes, Muhammad;s targeting of White people only bears that out with stark clarity. But his declaration of triumph in shouting "Allahu Akbar" makes his crimes acts that engage in and support the global Islamofascism jihad against the West; against the free world. Muhammad;s acts were both racist and Islamofascist.
The madness of Progressive political correctness is leading some to making the most contrived of statements about a "religion" that has yet to go through a reformation to expel violence from its tenets. Every other Great Religion has done so. Islam has not. Until such time Islam is not a Great Religion, but a creed that used to advance global domination.
The longer we deny the truth as mandated by facts, the longer we remain susceptible to murderous Islamofascists like Muhammad.
On April 4, South Sudan government militias loyal to the president, Salva Kiir Mayardit, entered the town of Pajok and began killing and raping men, women and children who were not part of the dominant Dinka tribe. Opposition forces led by the former first vice president estimate that more than 200 innocent civilians were killed.
These atrocities - easily considered crimes against humanity - are happening with the full knowledge of international bodies, including the UN, the African Union and the Troika, which includes United States, the UK and Norway.
And while the bleeding-heart Progressives in the West - especially in the United States - continue their campaign to force nations to accept "refugees" from war-torn Middle Eastern countries (i.e. Syria, Iraq, etc.), nary a peep is uttered about the victims of a true genocide in South Sudan.
I am not suggesting that we add the genocide victims of South Sudan into the "refugee relocation program," but I am suggesting that we - the United States and the West as a whole - re-evaluate how we go about aiding the threatened and oppressed in areas like Syria, Iraq and South Sudan.
Relocating people to distant lands where their cultures are foreign is a fool's errand. It doesn't create diversity, it creates confrontation and resentment. We need to craft policies and actions that allows these people to exist in their own lands while conflict resolutions are enacted.
Imagine Russia deciding for us that they were going to "relocate" "refugees" from the US South during the US Civil War...
43 people were killed and more than 100 injured in two separate Palm Sunday attacks at Coptic Christian churches in Egypt, each carried out by the Islamic State (IS) terror group.
For the umpteenth time this serves as proof positive that the violence committed at the hands of Islamofascists is not caused by Western presence in the Levant. That false-narrative is an excuse used by the jihadists to justify their violence against the innocent, attributing it to a political rather than a religious cause.
The fact of the matter is this: The violence that stems from Islam and the Islamofascist jihadis is based in the dogma's religious mandate.
If the Western world hadn't spent two generations telling their children that they were wonderful and smart; always winners and never losers; correct in their thoughts because they "feel" they are correct, then perhaps we all would have taken the time to actually read the Islamic texts so as to understand that the dogma is a mandate for violence, subjugation and dominance over the whole of the world. That - by the letter of their religious texts - is their mandate.
And far from what the Progressives and their snowflake sycophants would have everyone believe, the Islamic texts do sanction violence to spread their ideological control. Unlike the other truly Great Religions, Islam has not experienced a reformation to expunge violence from their creed. Until that happens the slaughter will continue.
RIP to all though peace loving, church-going Christians who perished at the hands of these cowardly barbarians.
Speaking during a Security Council emergency meeting convened in the wake of a WMD poison gas attack in northern Syria which killed at least 72 people, US UN Amb. Nikki Haley said evidence indicates the agent is more lethal than Bashar Assad has used before, and offered up pictures of victims.
The Trump administration has pointed its finger at Assad, but Russia has claimed that the chemicals were released when Syrian aircraft bombed a rebel-held factory making chemical weapons.
What we do know for certain is that Assad has used chemical weapons against his enemies in Syria in the past, and that the Islamic State (IS) has used make-shift and captured chemical weapons against Assad and Assad allied forces as well. Both sides in this elongated civil war are guilty of violating international treaties against the use of chemical and biological weapons.
We, in the West (because, evidently, the totalitarian nations of the Middle East and Asia don't have a conscience about it), must make a decision about whether we are willing to allow the use of WMD without a definitive response. Barack Obama's limp-wristed "red line" in Syria only served to embolden both the Russians and the Syrians. Now the Iranians are involved as well.
Pres. Trump's response must be perfect. He needs to speak for a coalition of world leaders who are willing to risk it all to push back against tyrants who would use these weapons of abomination. And the American people - who have because weak-willed where doing the right ting is concerned - must be prepared for the worst case scenario...and we haven't seen anything like this in almost two generations.
If you listened or watched coverage of the terror attack in London yesterday, you couldn't help but hear the usual suspect talking heads bending over backwards to omit the thought that was on everyone's minds: Was it another attack by an Islamifascist? As it turns out, the attacker, Khalid Masood, has been claimed as a soldier of the Islamic State. Imagine that.
Through it all I couldn't help but wonder something. What do you think the odds were in Las Vegas, before the attacker was identified, that he was an Islamist? Where the mainstream media wasn't brave enough to suppose the question, Vegas odds makers are not, how shall we say, politically correct; they adhere to the laws of probability.
What do you think those odds were? Common sense mandates that the odds were pretty good that the attacker - a man who used the exact modus operandi as prescribed by the Islamic State to wage murderous terror attacks against innocents - was an Islamofascist waging jihad in the name of Allah to conquer the world so that Islam could reign supreme.
But the laws of probability don't affect political correctness or the morally relative, multicultural Progressives who insist that ideological extremes - blind to reality - trump said laws. In this singular instance we witness enough proof that Progressives are both delusional and detached from reality.
And those types of people should never be allowed to ascend to seats of power.
Susan Rice, former National Security Advisor and UN Ambassador under Barack Obama, and who knowingly misled the American media and people on the facts surrounding the Benghazi attacks, which culminated in the assassination of a sitting UN Ambassador, has leveled criticism at the Trump Administration for of all things, factual accuracy in public statements.
Writing in the Washington Post, Rice states, "...when a White House deliberately dissembles and serially contorts the facts, its actions pose a serious risk to America’s global leadership, among friends and adversaries alike."
Did I miss something here? Did Rice hold a press conference to issue an apology to the American people for lying through her teeth about the catalyst for the terror attack in Benghazi? I remember quite clearly that she went on any and every talking head show she could get on in the aftermath of the attack and said - with bold certainty - that the cause of the Benghazi attack was a crudely made and little watched YouTube video critical of Islam.
Absent this apology and public admission of guilt where deceiving the people as a public official is concerned, who the hell is Susan Rice to lecture anyone about the damage false-flag narratives can be to US foreign policy credibility?
One has to wonder whether Rice is actually that vacuous, or whether she is still a part of a disinformation effort meant to protect the far-Left and smear the rest of the political and ideological fields.
Additionally, the Washington Post should be embarrassed that they ran her article...
The Dept. of Homeland Security has issued a ban on electronics larger than a smart phone on flights from eight countries predominantly Muslim countries: Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. DHS cites intelligence about terrorism risks as the reason for the move.
But, of course, the usual suspects are shrieking that this ban is an affront to religious liberties and the First Amendment because it discriminates against Muslims.
This is a perfect example of how the blindly ideological dismiss the realities of the world. Even Progressive-Leftist Rep. Adam Schiff (P-CA), was quick to acquiesce to the directive after being briefed by DHS officials on the catalyst for the move.
But that won't stop those who fail to consume necessary information to accurately base a judgment; form an opinion from declaring that they know all there is to know in their condemnation of the move.
Incidentally, other nations around the world are implementing this ban because of the intelligence acquired. Further, and this is the more important point, the ban does not discriminate against anyone based on their country of origin or their religious beliefs. It affects everyone - regardless of nationality or religion - who travels through those countries and on certain airlines dominant in those locales.
Of course, this defiance for ideology's sake is madness; it is illogical and emotionally knee-jerk. It is exactly what our nation's people need to not do if we are to become a nation that employs common sense in all things once again. We need to come back from the ledge of defiance for political and ideological purposes...
Lynne Stewart, an outspoken New York civil rights lawyer who represented radical clients ranging from the New Black Panthers to the Blind Sheikh, and who was released early from prison three years ago because she was expected to die of cancer has died. She was 77.
Stewart had been disbarred after she was convicted of helping a terrorist client communicate with his followers.
While I never wish anyone ill-will where their health is concerned (except for Islamofascist jihadis), Stewart was a terror-facilitating activist whose actions led to the killing of innocents; facilitated death for ideological purposes.
The issue of Civil Rights where Islamofascist terrorism is concerned - especially in the aftermath of Sept. 11, 2001 - is a tricky one. Progressives like to argue moral relativism in that they believe Islamofascist jihadis are "freedom fighters" rather than murderers of the innocent.
That said, Stewart wouldn't have been able to execute her activism if Congress would have don4e it's job after 9/11 and crafted a declaration of war appropriate for the foe.
The Palestinian Authority has named a children's summer camp after a terrorist, imagine that. The "Brothers of Dalal" youth camp is named in honor of Dalal Mughrabi, who led a 1978 attack in which terrorists hijacked a bus on Israel's coastal highway, wounding 70 and killing 37...12 of them children.
This is the mentality that will never align with peace in the Middle East. And this is why the United States should never again give a dime to this bloodthirsty group of barbarians.
Imagine the outrage if Cambodia named a youth summer camp after Pol Pot. Or if the Germans named a youth organization after Adolf Hitler. Imagine the churning of stomachs at Chicago naming a park district program after Richard Speck, or California naming a youth center for Charles Manson. It's exactly the same thing.
Mughrabi slaughtered innocents. He slaughtered children, and he did so without remorse because he was an Islamofascist slob. And the Palestinian Authority - an over-dressed gaggle of Islamofascist filth, that refuses to recognize Israel's right to exist - names a youth camp after this murderer...and celebrates it?!
There should be no more US taxpayer dollars allocated to the Palestinian Authority. Nor should we give any money to Islamofascist regimes who celebrate the demise of the West. Enough.
Georgetown University students, allegedly some of the brightest our nation has to offer, are outraged that a Muslim woman was allowed to deliver a speech criticizing Sharia law Tuesday, calling it "Islamophobic" and "hate speech."
Nonie Darwish (a person friend), who grew up Muslim in Egypt but later fled for the US and Christianity, was invited to speak to the Georgetown University College Republicans group, at an event co-sponsored by the Clare Booth Luce Policy Institute. But Some students protested the invitation of the "Islamophobic" Darwish, claiming in an student paper op-ed that by inviting Darwish, they gave a platform to "hateful and violent views."
All hope is lost on this generation of indoctrinated fools, or at least the overwhelming majority of college students who believe that their uneducated opinions on topics like Sharia Law and Islamofascism is relevant even though they know nothing of the dogma.
Sharia Law mandates that a woman is worth half that of a man. Sharia Law encourages husbands to regularly beat their wives to "keep them obedient." Sharia Law sentences homosexuals and adulterers to death. Sharia Law facilitates a fathers right to honor killings. Sharia Law mandates that Muslims believe they are superior to all other cultures and religions. In a nutshell, Sharia Law is everything these deceived and arrogant children say they are against, yet they label as "hateful" those who seek to educate others on the dangers of this totalitarian and intolerant creed.
Our higher education system has been taken over by ideologues with an ulterior motive; a motive other than instilling open minds and critical thinking skills, and this fact stands as one of the great dangers threatening freedom and liberty not just in the United States, but across the world.
Thank a Progressive for this...
The FBI has arrested a writer for several popular Liberal/Progressive blogs in an investigation into the dozens of bomb threats against Jewish community centers nationwide. They say the man made some of the threats in the name of an ex girlfriend as a way to exact revenge on her.
Juan Thompson, 31, of St. Louis, MO, has been charged with cyberstalking and making at least eight separate bomb threats against Jewish organizations. Thompson formally worked for Glenn Greenwald’s The Intercept and has written for the popular Progressive blogs like Daily Kos.
Now, the usual suspects of the Progressive Left (and no doubt the self-deprecating Jewish faction in our nation) will lay heavy on the narrative that Thompson was "mentally ill" and/or "misguided" therefore painting him a victim. The reality is he is a racist and a terrorist, and he should be tried on felony charges to that effect.
While the political Left creates informational chaos about Atty. Gen. Sessions based on no evidence of wrong-doing at all, they will twist themselves into rhetorical knots to distance this act of racism and terrorism from applying to the argument that Black Americans can be racists, too.
The false-narrative of racism only applying to White Americans will live on unless the Trump Administration makes an example of this idiot.
Forty-six year ago today a bomb exploded inside the US Capitol building. The explosion caused an approximately $300,000 (in 1970s dollars) in damage but thankfully no one was hurt. A group calling itself the "Weather Underground" claimed credit for the bombing, They said the bombing was in protest of the ongoing US military activity in Laos.
The "Weathermen," whose ideological foundations were in Marxism, were a violently radical faction of the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS); advocating violence as a means to transform American society.
Why is this moment in history, given all the upheaval during the 1960s and early 1970s significant? Because one notable member of the Weather Underground was Bill Ayers, a close confidant and Chicago neighbor of Pres. Barack Obama. Many believe - and with good reason - that Ayers even ghost wrote Mr. Obama's book, Dreams from My Father.
Today, the same "activists" holding the same Progressive (read: Fabian Socialist and Marxist) ideology are recking havoc in the streets of our urban areas and plotting and executing disruptions at Republican town hall meetings, and trying to delegitimize the Trump presidency at every turn.
Something to keep in mind going forward..